Quote:
Originally Posted by foxbivvy  Yes, no proof either way. Consciousness as the first creator though is much more likely. As for a start it solves the "hard problem" as coined by philosopher Chalmers.
The universe is more likely composed of possible states of conscious experience. If it is possible to experience ghosts - you will experience it. But it is not possible if you do not believe it. And so the proof you find is of a personal nature. I know it exists because I allowed it  You could, if you wanted to, but you don't, and that's ok, it's your choice. There are many people in this world that know that spiritual entities exist. A few scientists do. Are you really telling me that if a scientist comes out that he spoke to a ghost, but cannot repeat it for doubting observers, that he will not be shunned by mainstream science. Get real :P |
I don't know why Consciousness as the first creator is more likely because there is no proof. That's just a thinking flaw. That's just assuming something for the sake of assuming something
Saying the universe is made of states of consciousness and then thinking you understand the universe is just as flawed as saying the universe is made of tiny pizza's that we cannot see. It's an assumption of something you really don't know. At least science is smart enough to say they don't know.
And if a scientist comes out saying he talked to a ghost, but cannot reproduce it in front of watchers, than that is no proof indeed. That's what science is (mostly) all about, reproducing results.
Your assumptions are led by philosophers and teachings, but when will you empty your head and think for your self?