Quote:
Originally Posted by wulph  I agree with the money as social debt paradigm. What I don't get is why Mother Teresa wasn't a billionaire. Surely she contributed much more than some billionaires (even some honest ones).
How is someone volunteering for Habitat for Humanity contributing less than a subcontractor? What kind of decisions need to be made to "stake your claim" on your share of social debt?
Edit: It seems you answered this question here. |
In addition to Steve's comparison of who provides more value to society, remember that Mother Teresa was funded by a billion-dollar corporation.