View Single Post
Old 08-13-2008, 01:53 AM   #72 (permalink)
wulph
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 103
wulph is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve Pavlina View Post
Since money is social debt, having lots of money means that you've given much more value than you received.
I agree with the money as social debt paradigm. What I don't get is why Mother Teresa wasn't a billionaire. Surely she contributed much more than some billionaires (even some honest ones).

How is someone volunteering for Habitat for Humanity contributing less than a subcontractor? What kind of decisions need to be made to "stake your claim" on your share of social debt?

Edit: It seems you answered this question here.

Last edited by wulph; 08-13-2008 at 01:56 AM.
wulph is offline   Reply With Quote