View Single Post
Old 12-11-2006, 04:06 PM   #36 (permalink)
wolfgang
Family Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,566
wolfgang has a reputation beyond reputewolfgang has a reputation beyond reputewolfgang has a reputation beyond reputewolfgang has a reputation beyond reputewolfgang has a reputation beyond reputewolfgang has a reputation beyond reputewolfgang has a reputation beyond reputewolfgang has a reputation beyond reputewolfgang has a reputation beyond reputewolfgang has a reputation beyond reputewolfgang has a reputation beyond repute
Default

I JUST saw "An Inconvenient Truth"

It seems that burning coal for power is the biggest contributor and to keep up with populations and energy demands there won't be enough energy without building more power plants and they are going to have to be nuclear.

Of all the solutions outlined in Inconvenient Truth, I was surprised that eating meat was not in the list. Apparently there is a big difference in our CO2 emmisions between eating meat and mot eating meat!
wolfgang is offline   Reply With Quote