[Angela]

Originally Posted by John Freestone

Ah, the defense on the grounds that if this person isn't damaging or dangerous, somebody else will destroy the stupid people anyway.

Yes. Something will get everybody, in the end.

Good. And we'll just ignore the fate of those who are vulnerable, perhaps through not being too bright. Stupid people are just stupid and there's no point in education or protection for people who can't be educated to the point where they can look after themselves, I suppose?

Well, I will, anyway. I am resting assured that you are looking out for them, and I trust you to be diligent and unstoppable in that.

I expected better of you than this. Now, I know I'm taking an extreme example, but I don't quite know how else to understand this 'Darwinist' point (unless it was just a regrettable flight of humour, and you know, it is kind of funny how stupidly some people kill themselves, if you like that kind of humour).

Yes, the little winky smiley indicates that it is indeed a regrettable flight of humor (except I don't regret it ). I do find the that kind of humor very funny. Part of the reason I find it funny in this context is that I am amused by the indefatigable commitment on some people's part to taking everything extremely seriously, and that everyone else should do the same.

But wait -- doesn't your Bhuddist practice mean letting go of expectations?

Relating it to the discussion, it seems to back up your other point and in summary is: to hell with the stupid people. Why should I give a crap if they're conned?

People learn what they're ready to learn when they're ready to learn it, as I see it, and I am willing to grant them the freedom to be conned, if that's what's there for them.

Anyway, I think maybe you think people are far more stupid than I do. So I will leave the fretting to you.

And once again, thanks for quoting me!