Quote:
Originally Posted by ThoughtAddict  To be honest, I'm mostly clueless about the funding of universities. My understanding from working in a development office at a public university was that funding came primarily from the state, then from donors, the majority of whom were alumni. Then again, this was for a narrow humanities field, so it may be different for technological research. Could you provide me a source so I can research this? I'd appreciate it, as you've piqued my curiosity. |
Here's a good article.
Science's Worst Enemy: Corporate Funding | DISCOVER Magazine Quote:
Originally Posted by ThoughtAddict No, we all don't. I don't. This is perhaps the first time I've heard of an effective cure for cancer. A couple of my friends are aspiring oncologists (many of whom have done research with St. Jude, which receives the majority of its funding from individual donations). Whatever cure you're talking about, let me know and I'll pass it on to them. These friends are ambitious and trying to make a name. They'll probably bite. |
Oxygen therapy is a biggie. Last I heard one had to go to Mexico for treatment. (This may have changed.) Cancer cells cannot live in an oxygen rich environment.
There's even a cheap way to inhale oxygen, (food grade hydogen peroxide, which is water with an extra oxygen atom attached.)
Prostate cancer cured by inhaling H202. 80 years ago in India, it was used to cure a pneumonia epidemic.
Kumbucha tea, from the Tibetan mountains. Which is green tea fermented. The fermentation process
vastly increases the potency of the extreme health benefits of green tea.
This company was created because it's founder's Mother beat breast cancer by drinking it.
There's more cures that recognize what true medicine is, rather then to just cut out organs, or simply Radiate the body.
But these cures have no monetary value, (H202 costs pennies on the dollar to produce) hence are of no use to the present Financial Medical Infrastructure.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThoughtAddict The deafening silence of the scientific community in response adds to my skepticism. |
LOL.....The deafening silence of
Corporate funded scientific community. But I'll not get into that.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThoughtAddict The NHA... the same NHA that is funded by Shell, BP, Chevron, GM, and GE, among others? See http://www.hydrogenassociation.org/p...enMessages.pdf. Aren't they the ones who are suppressing this information?
I checked out the NHA site. They're focused on using hydrogen as an energy carrier rather than performing energy creating electrolysis. The focus on using some energy source (solar, air, nuclear) to perform hydrolysis. The resulting H2 and O2 are stored in tanks or fuel cells and the energy is used. Once used, the tanks or cells are recharged using the renewable source. I could not find anything about energy creating electrolysis devices in cars. Link? |
Kevin Kantola at Hydrogen Cars & Vehicles interviewed Patrick Serfass, Director of Communications for the National Hydrogen Association from this blog.
Water based hybrid systems: South Korean Govt: 100,000 trucks must use HHO Quote:
Originally Posted by ThoughtAddict Not at all hard to believe. They're willing to start wars and ruin lives for their profits. However, they would only try to block technology that actually works. I'm yet to see oil companies take any action to block this technology. Again, source please? |
But where would you see this? Would it be in the Mainstream news? The actions taken would of course be in a secretive manner.
Blocking technology, of course is a criminal act, and extremely bad publicity.
So you see the problem when you ask for a source.
But it is out there, if one looks.
Sepp Hasslberger: Pogue, Hydrogen - Stories of Suppression Directory:Suppression - PESWiki
(Both sites are very in depth and really gets one to think things thru.)