Quote:
Originally Posted by JBRU  I'm unable to answer that question. A) It's completely hypothetical. There isn't a child or a rapist. They are constructs of our conversation. |
Ok, you've definitely disqualified yourself. I can't take you serious anymore. You talk about the LoA, and how everybody attracts everything, etc. And if I ask a simple question: Did the rapist or the child attract the rape? Then they're suddenly but constructs of our conversation ... You're simply coping out on the hard parts. You're ignoring the logical consequences of thinking your theories trough.
Quote:
|
B) If we were to discuss a specific example, I would be unable to know the specifics of each participant's innermost thoughts.
|
So you don't exclude that the child attracted its rapist? Good to know.