Quote:
Originally Posted by Brutha 
CO2 on the other hand isn't that problematic on the ground but something that we don't want to have in our atmosphere.
|
Huh?
"on the ground"?
How do you have health threatening Vehicle emissions not be problematic "on the ground"?
Maybe you meant natural CO2 emissions ?
I'm talking about CO2 in the context of poisonous emissions from a vehicle engines.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brutha Certainly there are a bunch of good reasons for filtering air and removing toxic particles from it, but there not always the same as climate change. |
The earth has
always had warming and cooling periods.
But ya gotta admit, the sheer amounts of pollution do play a factor in the delicate balance of the natural eco-system, no?
Put a tiny gas engine, say 1 cc, in a
sealed garage. Any plants in there (and humans) wont be around for long.
Now it does depend on how many plants you have in there. If the garage were jam packed with plants, would be a different story.
But I don't think the "braniacs" hacking away at the Rain forest is helping the eco-system handle the extra emissions we put out.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brutha |
I agree.
The easiest and safest "geo-gambling" is getting rid of the problem in the first place. Pollution.
Which means switching over to non-Oil based locomotion.