My question really is more about extremes. If people truly believe in subjective reality and IM, that we manifest our own reality, that thoughts create reality -- then why would they go to extremes in diet like water fasting, restricted diets where only raw food is allowed, and so on? What would be the benefit of that, if we could make a declaration about food that fits within what more people would call reasonable guidelines?
Yesterday I picked up a tome by Gary Null which is about 300 million pages long, and it's about living forever through diet. I tried to take a look at it today but it makes me feel immensely tired. Is it easier to jump through all those hoops, 300 million pages of guidelines, a truckload of supplements, gallons of (fresh, organic, home-squeezed) juice every day, gallons of water every day, no meat/dairy/wheat/etc. . . or is it easier to eat a diet which most people we know would agree is a reasonably healthy one, and declare as reality, "I am in excellent health and I feel great!"
If we are creating our own reality, why are some of us, for instance, creating a reality where a raw food diet is the healthiest one, when it's so utterly restrictive?
Jennihul -- what about the blood-type diet? Why, if we can create any reality we desire?  |