Quote:
Originally Posted by wolfgang  I think MasterD is rejecting that it's a clear DW approach all together. That it's a stupid approach. A DW would not do this because it would eventually harm the DW's well being in the future. So it's an attempt to be greedy as a DW is but not well thought out because the DWs motivation to help himself is going to be hindered in the future. |
I don't see any downside to this approach in the way it was presented. There were no specifics included, just that the DW in question is using his skills in manipulation to get people to over spend. I'm just now seeing where it harms the darkworker's well being.
You could do this for 5 days, make $100k, and then use that $100k to hire others to do something else for you at a reduced rate and continue to parlay this ownership to more power.
Where do you see a downside for the darkworker? Unless he is caught or not cunning enough to prevent buyers remorse (you can change someones mentality from want to need very quickly with a bit of suggestion thanks to the many many infused messages in the form of advertisements. I've done so in sales.)