Quote:
Originally Posted by shnu  I think the light vs. dark (vs. NPC) thing is obscuring what's going on with Steve's account. In the first place there are life's purpose, and the awareness that comes from making a commitment to one's purpose. The point about polarity is a secondary concept, which is meant to understand problems one might have when executing on that commitment; that is, the syndromes.
But polarity does not exist in a pure form: no-one truly makes a commitment to "light" in a pure form, rather, it's all about how one tries to live one's purpose in your life. The whole talk of light- versus dark- aligned without any talk of what purposes these aligned people are committing to is a bit unreal. |
Thats my entire argument. Steve and others make the label of Lightworker sound all encompassing. They don't limit the discription to just a general job choice or a general intent.
ALL PEOPLE ARE SHADES OF GRAY... Some lighter and some darker...
People are also dynamic and can change or they can also make independent decisions that are light or dark.
I agree that one can be Enlightened, love based, and focus on serving the overall good. In my experiences, most unsuccessful people are takers. If you notice its people who give the most that receive the most. I can see this power clearly. For those that are not enlightened they think that if you take you'll gain. To somehow create a label called Darkworker and then call it an equal power of polarity I would disagree with completely. The power of love based thought is more likely to bring you success.
People who are fear based have to bite their tongue and pose as love based and to give simply to have any success whatsoever. This blows the theory right out of the water.
Humans have an overwhelming and extreme desire to create labels and to take very complex subjects and filter things to fit the label; this much is clear.