Quote:
Originally Posted by PrimaryErn  Just because I disagree with your point of view, doesn't mean that I'm choosing to be deaf to your point or that I didn't read your post. You assume that your point or argument is so perfect that anybody who takes the time to read it or think about it would have to agree (which I think is a rule about internet debating someplace). I thought about it, and I don't agree with it due to what I think are logical consistancy factors. |
If you think my definitions are flawed I completely understand - I'm not surprised that different people have different definitions.
But the logical inconsistencies you brought up in your post don't really apply to my definitions.
Are my definitions tailor-made to be a cop out, and not true or valid, perhaps just simply wrong? Very possible.
Are my definitions logically inconsistent in the way you stated? No.. they have caveats and catches and clauses :P Maybe this makes them wrong but it doesn't make them inconsistent with each other.
I don't have any beef here, I'm just being honest.
I appreciate that you're willing to take the time to read my stuff and reply, it helps me to think through my own ideas.