It often goes like this:
1. Offer of service (pizza, advice, love)
2. Rejection or acceptance of service
The key point being that proper service does not
force the service on anyone. It's an offering. The recipient is free to accept or reject. This respects the recipient's free will. For instance Angela offers her advice on the forum, but anyone is free to reject it and ignore her.
Quote:
|
Is proper service to deliver a pizza to someone who is grossly obese?
|
Abstaining from service is a very very important thing to do. People have to choose what forms of service they are willing to do.
If a person is asking me to kill them, I'm going to turn them down, because killing people is not a service I'm willing to give.
Notice the definition I gave:
Quote:
|
The nature of proper service is to serve the exact wants and needs of some other entity if serving in that way aligns with your own true self. |
A lightworker certainly abstains from many things. Choosing what to abstain from is as important as choosing what to give. Free will is paramount, both in the giver and the receiver.
The giver freely chooses to give and the receiver freely chooses to receive or reject. This is classic positive polarity. This is 99.9% of interactions involving lightworkers.
The other .1% (less actually) are cases where it gets much more complicated, but this rarely happens to people, especially between adults. Here we're talking about things like emergencies, war, and cases where a person is a danger to society. Dealing with these outlying cases is a very large study in and of itself - it involves children, animals, and the Earth. I have a lot to say on this but I'll leave it for another time. These cases barely enter into the lives of most people.
I want to stress that a true lightworker like Jesus almost never uses force. He certainly did at times - but it was so extremely rare. Most people spend their whole lives justifying sprees of negative action by saying they had no other option, but this is almost never true, and what they are in fact doing is violating someone's free will and then back-rationalizing. Usually the perpetrators are following the unconscious conditioning that the corporate media has heaved on them.
It's worth noting that it was their free will choice to watch TV and so be conditioned into this state. The TV offered brainwashing, the "consumer" accepted it.