Quote:
|
The polarity challenge is to consciously decide whether or not to be a cancer cell. When you're ignorant of the decision, you end up taking many cancerous actions by default because you aren't aware of what you're doing.
|
So....by consciously choosing to be a darkworker, and being aware of what I'm doing, I won't be taking cancerous actions by default? I will be journeying down a path of enlightenment - albeit a different path then lightworkers?
That doesn't match the "kill the darkworkers" attitude I seem to get from the new polarity postings - and from the mob-response here about the evil darkworkers.
You say that you encourage people to be darkworkers because people have free will and a right to exercise it? That makes no sense to me.
Look - I know I must not be getting it and I don't seem to be getting a direct answer, so I'll ask more directly:
Put bluntly - in a
previous post you said being a consciously-choosing-to-be-darkworker was a different path but still a path to enlightenment. That you encouraged people to follow the path - not that you encouraged people to 'exercise their free will even if it is a destrucitve choice'. You specifically said: "I also want to encourage those who choose to pursue the darkworker path because as long as they keep growing in awareness, all of us will ultimately benefit from it. "
Now you are saying being a darkworker is bad, and darkworkers are bad for society as a whole. And I don't see how you can reconcile those two beliefs.
So I guess my question would be:
Do you still encourage people to pursue the darkworker path, because as long as they follow that path and keep growing all of us will ultimately benefit?
and
What sort of ultimate benefits will humanity get that you envisioned in the original post?
For the mob of readers yelling for the death/cessation of darkworkers (and pinning the 'darkworker' label on every cause they personally dislike), if a darkworkers approached you, and you were about to...let's say 'convince' them to stop being a darkworker, and they said "but
Steve said HE encouraged me to pursue this path because all of YOU" -and then he points at you - " would ultimately BENEFIT FROM IT", how would you respond? Would you still demand they cease being a darkworker?
I'm sorry - there's a logical inconsistancy here and it's like trying to digest a piece of metal - I'm choking on it and its not going down.
I truly wonder if its just terminology. The original definition of light and dark worker were more like "self- and other-worker". Now the definition is "self-which-leads-to-evil worker and others-which-leads-to-good worker". And everyone is like, "Ooohh, i want the second one, I'm a good guy!" Where originally it was "well, I'm not sure what path I should take. Hmm. Both lead to enlightenment, according to Steve, so maybe its just a question of commiting to a style and discipline, since neither path is evil".