Once again, Steve's concept of Darkworker / Lightworker is too confusing for me. It makes no sense.
Even the whole analogy of cellular activity is confusing. Of course if you label it from the point of view of "Would you rather be a healthy cell or a cancerous cell?" or "Would you rather be good or evil?" everyone is going to want to be good or non-cancerous!
Do you really think that any so-called "Darkworkers" actually believe that they are "cancerous" though? I would guess that most of them feel that they are justified in their actions.
Who judges whether or not an activity is for the "greater good" or not? If a police officer walks into a school classroom and sees a suicide-bomber with C4 strapped to his chest and he shoots him in the head to save the 30 children in the room, does that make him a Darkworker or a Lightworker? He killed one to save 30.
Do scientists in the lab who experiment on rats while trying to find a cure for a deadly disease qualify as darkworkers? THey kill living things! What about a cellular biologist who does experiments on human cells? What about the US Soldiers in Iraq who are following orders? Are they darkworkers?
Or are they Lightworkers because they are fighting to save the world from "evil" and they're doing it for the greater good?
Although I wholeheartedly believe in helping the world to become a better place, I personally find very little value in these labels of "Lightworkers" and "Darkworkers". It just seems like another Egotistical tactic to judge and seperate ourselves from one another. I'm not going to label myself or anyone else as a Lightworker or a Darkworker. I'm Paul. I am who I am, and I do my best to express love in the world, regardless whether it be to help a lady cross the street, to help my family, to help my employees, to help my friends, to help a complete stranger, to help the world, to help myself, to help my dog or whatever. |