I still don't see answered the comparison between this tenor or post about darkworker vs. the older one, and believe me, they sound vastly different - but I gather its not going to be.
I also think the previous definition of darkworker, as defined here - as someone working for self, vs group - has obviously just changed to "collective, new-agey good, using light energy" vs "selfish, vampiric evil, using evil energy". It's sort of a shame, because it was interesting to consider both forms of paths as a service to the greater good, which is much more intricate and elegant view of things rather than "self-oriented = vampires". But I suppose the new definition of lightworker is hella more sexy, obviously, given everybody's reactions and everyone clamoring to identify themselves as "lightworkers".
I was a little put off by it, actually - but reconsidering, I guess the darkworker that I always found neat to consider was not the same darkworker that he wrote about in this latest post. I suppose darkworker 1.0 versus the new darkworker 2.0 definition
This sounds like someone saying "D&D is a bad game" and me getting annoyed, because I was thinking about D&D ver 2 - but if the person was talking about D&D ver 3 I'd agree.
I guess I'm the only confused one. Seriously - nobody sees the darkworker definition here as definition from the previous one? Where I am getting lost?