I'm going to join in the chorus of confused people asking how this post jibes with the previous polarity ones, because it doesn't, and I don't see the question being answered either.
In the past, if I understood your old posts, you felt explained that darkworkers were on a path, but if I understood your previous position, you felt that darkworking and lightworking were simply different paths, and that awareness (which leads to a conscious decision to polarize, and that polarizing is a good thing).
Now darkworkers who are really pursuing their goal are selfish to the point of evil, and lightworkers are saintly and working for the collective good. Darkworkers are Lucifer and lightworkers are the Dalai Lama. That's an ENORMOUS difference to previous polarity posts and frankly I have to wonder where it comes from! It seems very angry, to me, imo.
I could go on about how the whole light vs dark concept is pretty black and white and very little in the real world works that way. In fact, that was one of the reasons that I enjoyed the point of view of the polarity posts originally, because it talked about how sometimes the darkworker was not a bad path, given the circumstances.
I think maybe the thinking used to be more that 'darkworker' was 'selfworker' - i.e., one who focused on the skin in. And lightworker was 'otherworker'. Now darkworker has turned into 'selfish to the point of amorality and sociopathic'.
It doesn't jibe (he says with a sing song voice)...
Quote:
|
While some might label the darkworker path as evil path, I dislike using words like good or evil to describe these paths. They’re really two different sides of the same coin. A darkworker experiences unconditional love by recognizing that s/he is God, adopting a life of service to self. A lightworker learns to see God in others, adopting a life of service to what s/he perceives to be the greater good.
|