Hi Steve,
I just wanted to comment that this article seems to be a lot less neutral towards lightworkers and darkworkers compared to your previous polarization articles.
Example (
Darkworkers, Lightworkers, and Levels of Consciousness):
Quote:
|
At lower levels of consciousness, these two paths seem distinct because the individual cell doesn’t yet have the understanding to know what’s truly best for itself or for the whole body. So it makes a lot of foolish decisions and mistakes. The darkworker cell competes with other cells, taking resources from them as needed to ensure its own survival, thinking that’s a smart way to get ahead. But then other cells suffer, and the body suffers as well. Eventually there’s a backlash against the darkworker cell to preserve the health of the body. It gets punished for hurting the body. This is what I call Darkworker Syndrome. It’s what happens when a darkworker simply isn’t aware enough to recognize that his/her own good and the good of all are inseparably linked.
|
Quote:
|
Now the interesting thing is that these paths lead to the same place. For example, when we act as darkworkers from total self-interest, we eventually see that we must account for the health of the whole body. If the body dies, we go down with it, which does not serve our own needs.
|
It seems to contrast a lot with
Quote:
|
They have no qualms about damaging the body to further their own aims since the health of the body is of little consequence to them.
|
Before, it was clear enough to me that darkworkers who had little concern for the body were just darkworkers at lower levels of consciousness (i.e. they had "Darkworker Syndrome"). But now I'm not sure.
I don't know. It just feels like this new article confused things more than clarified them.