Quote:
Originally Posted by Plato  Dude, I think I finally understand where you're coming from! Correct me if I am wrong here at any stage: |
Yeah, I was simply saying that I dis-agree with what you're saying; that it's OK to be abusive to people who are less fortunate that you (in terms of social skills). I don't agree with that at all. That said, I accept that people will do all kinds of things that I don't think are right (murder, rape, being abusive etc); yeah, it makes no difference if I agree with them or not, or the morality of it, the only issues, are can they do it? and can am I going to let them?
That make sense?
I mean, some people are happy to go out and kill people; if someone wants to kill me, I'm not going to stand their and debate the morality of it with them!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Plato P1. You think it is morally wrong to be abusive to others
P2(a). It was generally "popular" (for want of a better word) people who have been abusive to you in the past.
(b). Most attractive women are "popular."
P3. We can assume that anybody who is similar to the people who were abusive to you in school would also be abusive to you, put into the same situations.
P4. All "popular" people tend to be abusive towards those less "popular"
P5. Popular people are inherently morally bad people.
P6. You are not abusive to other people.
P7. You are a morally good person.
P8. Morally good people are better than morally bad people
C. You are better than "popular" people (which includes attractive women). |
Crickey, that's long list dude! Why does life have to be some frickin' complicated? Why so much analasis? It all seems inappropriate to me.
F**k it. I'm not better than anyone. I'm just me.