Quote:
Originally Posted by Strokes  I already pointed out where it is illogical if you did not see. |
You're right, I didn't see. Because you mentioned biology, not the Big Bang.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Strokes Is it now? And how so? |
Science isn't concerned with 'higher' purpose. Science is a body of knowledge and the processes involved in collecting that knowledge.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Strokes Oh, now it all becomes clear. It's humanity, yes, and tell me, what is your definition of humanity? |
In that context 'humanity' meant 'human nature'.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Strokes Have I not already repeated? What is the theory of selective breeding? Punett Squares? A human theory of genetics and heredity! But does it really matter yet for advancing our way of life while we live on earth? It is to boost the earth, goodness for the race of people! Yet life is not just a large battleground to finding the meaning of it and advancing humankind! Do many atheists not belive in Armageddon? So what will their efforts have meant then? What you basically say is that we just arrived, and that there is therefore no purpose at all to our existence. Nothing cannot create knowledge and love, and it certainly cannot create beings that are smart enough to refute them or even have the ability to come up with a theory about it in the first place. Can a manmade couch give us a theory on why it's here? It's that same concept, just common sense. Even the couch itself is man's own rendition of what they feel as comfort, but that's just making a point. |
None of this demonstrates a lack of support for evolution.