Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve Pavlina  I thought about adding a wiki to the site a couple years ago. It seems like it would take a lot of admin/moderation work to create one of high quality. |
I would recommend making the current forum moderators admins of the wiki. They've proved their worth.
I don't anticipating much admin work being required though - the community is composed of pretty responsible people.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve Pavlina Accounting for the deliberate wrongdoer could be quite a burden, although there are various ways to deal with that. |
Give edit access only to registered members. That minimises the potential for deliberate wrongdoing by anonymous outsiders.
It's been my experience with wikis that, as long as the rightdoers outweigh the wrongdoers they tend to be self-regulating - any vandalism is quickly erased.
The beauty of starting a wiki here is that you're starting with a community of personal-development-seeking rightdoers.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve Pavlina There's an opportunity cost with each new project added. I honestly didn't see the wiki coming out near the top. I figured that my best bet would be to write a book and/or create other info products. I think the value delivery would be higher than with a wiki.
Other projects I'd probably rank higher than a wiki would be video blogging and webinars. |
Those are great projects, but they're not comparable to a wiki - they're all one-to-many communication channels that enable you to talk to us. A wiki is a many-to-many communication medium.
If you would be so kind as to host a wiki and create the initial administrator group it need involve no additional work on your end: we can take it from there.