Quote:
Originally Posted by Acting Like Godot  Oh, sorry. I did get your PM earlier, but you didn't give your email address, and I only have the paper in PDF format (the private messaging system on Steve's forum doesn't allow me to upload PDF files).
Anyway, I've now printed out the paper and here are the scanned images: IMG_0001.jpg (image) IMG_0002.jpg (image) IMG_0003.jpg (image) IMG_0004.jpg (image)
Well, Mrs Cogan, I don't think I will be discussing with you or responding to your comments any further in this thread. I don't mean to be rude - it's just that our respective belief systems on reality etc are just too far apart for engagement, so we would just be wasting each other's time. Whatever meaningful discussion we could have, we've probably already had.
(And I do believe that for many readers, this has actually turned out to be a very interesting thread - certainly you contributed to that). |
Ok. Here's how this trick was done.
TK led the group that prayed for bottles A & B. TK was also the person who photographed the frozen water droplets. He didn't send ALL the photographs to DR. He preselected the ones to be sent. He sent 12 of A, 12 of B, 7 of C and 9 of D. (For those of you playing along C & D were the un-prayed for control bottles.) In other words he sent 24 good ones and 16 bad ones. That alone tells me he knew which bottles were which. Even if evaluating the crystals produced random results (which I think it did), there was no way the experiment could turn out the wrong way. Heads I win, tails you lose.
It's all still garbage.