View Single Post
Old 01-08-2008, 05:42 PM   #9 (permalink)
seeker5
Family Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,606
seeker5 is a jewel in the roughseeker5 is a jewel in the roughseeker5 is a jewel in the roughseeker5 is a jewel in the rough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mlc82 View Post
Continuing from the "protein" debating in previous threads, there is one thing that's always stood out to me- In all of the nutrition classes/seminars that I've attended, there's always someone who loves to talk about the "dumb bodybuilders" and how they eat way too much protein, and how it doesn't do them any good. Yet I've also noticed that every speaker who has said this has also looked nothing like a bodybuilder.
There was a gym where I belonged that had a non-muscular-looking trainer. The other trainer told me that he was a vegetarian, so he didn't gain a lot of muscles. However, when it came to actually lifting, the trainer told me how amazed he was at how much strength he had for his size.

Perhaps, then the mass of muscle does not have a 1-to-1 correlation to the strength of the muscles? Perhaps it's possible for some smaller muscles to be stronger then some bigger muscles?

Last edited by seeker5; 01-08-2008 at 05:46 PM.
seeker5 is offline   Reply With Quote