[Jaben]

Originally Posted by Dan.Linehan

How about responsibility for tax dollars used to build weapons / fund violence?

If this is a concern we can minimize tax payments by investing in the exchange of value while minimizing cashflow.

I guess if cashflow really equated to value flow than I'd agree with Steve's preference for

a strong connection between my value delivery and cashflow.

But you can only control your own flow. Any cash flow is likely to have tax residual effect if only indirectly.

Wouldn't building a stronger connection between value delivery and value flow while minimizing cashflow be more 'responsible'?

If you resonate with fear you might be worried as to how the reciprocity would be regulated, but with an abundance paradigm an unregulated exchange should be considered possible and beneficial.