View Single Post
Old 11-21-2006, 02:23 AM   #9 (permalink)
ReallyGoodIdeas
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 320
ReallyGoodIdeas is on a distinguished road
Send a message via Skype™ to ReallyGoodIdeas
Default

Yeah - I read Power vs Force recently, and can find agreement with all the comments on one level or another!

My experience with muscletesting is that I visited a muscle testing chiropractor regularly for 20 years. It was always accurate in the context he used it. The early EFT pioneers used muscle testing, but would test themselves not the client. It's been largely replaced in modern EFT by using your intuition directly. I can see that it's a way of reading your intuition. As someone there said, the intent behind the test is vital. If subconsciously, you are not aligned with the purpose or the actual test, you'll test wrongly. I've been experimenting with the self-muscle testing myself, and find it useful, but I have to be very careful about my intent. I've caught myself out a few times.

My daughter is able to mess with my tests by deciding to be strong and to ignore what i say, when testing her. But when i've tested friends without giving them any background information, just tell them what to do, it works quite accurately.

I loved the book, it seemed to provide a context to understand how other people think. Certainly explains politics well!! And I've used self-muscle testing to work out other people's levels of consciousness according to the guide.

Do I know it's accurate?

If I start questioning it, I'll get inaccurate results. It's like Steve's million dollar experiment isn't it? Maybe a bit like faith as well. Maybe some things you CAN'T prove and you just have to KNOW they're true.
__________________
Learn EFT and change your life today!
http://www.reallygoodideas.com.au
hazelb@reallygoodideas.com.au
ReallyGoodIdeas is offline   Reply With Quote