View Single Post
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 11-02-2007, 03:16 AM
Mark Lapierre Mark Lapierre is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,061
Mark Lapierre is on a distinguished road
Send a message via Skype™ to Mark Lapierre
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ixmatus View Post
'Law of Divine Oneness' then 'Law of Polarity'? That is a divine contradiction.
The 'Law of Divine Oneness' states that everything is connected. It doesn't state that everything is the same, so there's no contradiction with the 'Law of Polarity', which states that everything exists on a continuum.

I think the "laws" sound very nice, but they're built on a number of assumptions so are only of any use if you agree with them (which I don't). I do agree with some of the principles upon which they're based, such as action leading to results. They're beliefs, not laws.

But yes, these "laws" appear in different forms throughout all the spiritual/mystical/new-age/self-help texts that I've read. Including some of what Steve had written. That doesn't mean they're accurate, only popular.
Reply With Quote