That list is pretty silly, in my opinion. Far too many contradicting 'laws' to make any of the others plausible, I see many of the others as a simple rephrasing of other ones.
'Law of Divine Oneness' then 'Law of Polarity'? That is a divine contradiction. IMHO neither are correct because we do indeed experience polarity, but, we also experience oneness (meditation, joy, etc...). So for one to be universal would imply the other could not possibly exist. There are others on that list, but, this was the best example.
I also feel that stating any law as universal is pretty silly. I do indeed believe in the Abraham-Hicks material and use it, I also read Neville Goddard's work extensively - but, they are still the words 'of others' and are never entirely correct in relationship to the symbolic (and allegoric) connections my consciousness makes with the reality that is constantly moving forward through those connections.
Law of Attraction? I would prefer a different phrase, one less prone to use the word 'law', preferably a word that allowed the concept an expression that didn't end in a paradox.
That is my take on this stuff.  |