Thread: Proof (Blog)
View Single Post
Old 10-24-2007, 01:35 AM   #109 (permalink)
Mark Lapierre
Family Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,061
Mark Lapierre is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.Mustache View Post
Not likely. The simplest explanation appears to be design.
That 'simplest' explanation requires that the designer be explained, which automatically increases the complexity of the explanation beyond the thing being explained.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.Mustache View Post
Also, you cannot explain consciousness by purely materialistic means. Therefore cannot completely explain ourselves at this moment.
Being unable to fully explain consciousness in purely materialistic terms does not mean that what we can explain is invalid.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve Pavlina View Post
You can do the same experiment and get the same result in a dream world while you're dreaming. Either way the experiment, the imaginary Starbucks, and the outcome still exist only within your mind. You're imagining the whole thing.
The difference between the dream world and the real world is that the real world is consistent.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve Pavlina View Post
Show me something that exists outside your mind and not within it.
Are you demanding proof?
Mark Lapierre is offline   Reply With Quote