View Single Post
Old 09-17-2007, 08:36 AM   #29 (permalink)
Michael Chui
Family Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Seattle, Washington, USA
Posts: 3,977
Michael Chui has much to be proud ofMichael Chui has much to be proud ofMichael Chui has much to be proud ofMichael Chui has much to be proud ofMichael Chui has much to be proud ofMichael Chui has much to be proud ofMichael Chui has much to be proud ofMichael Chui has much to be proud ofMichael Chui has much to be proud of
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathStorm View Post
Why in the world should a person who is "usually more open to new situations and dangerous environments" necessarily have the other features that Jung would categorize under the tag "extrovert"?
And why would a person who usually "thinks rather than acting" be an "introvert"?
Where do you get this? I've never heard such descriptions for introversion and extraversion.

If you didn't read the link that NotesMaeve posted, try reading this one:
Socionics :: Extraversion / Introversion

There is no such thing as an "introvert" or an "extrovert". Those aren't people; those are specific parts of people.
Michael Chui is offline   Reply With Quote