View Single Post
Old 09-10-2007, 04:25 PM   #11 (permalink)
Brutha
Family Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Berlin, Germany
Posts: 8,749
Brutha has much to be proud ofBrutha has much to be proud ofBrutha has much to be proud ofBrutha has much to be proud ofBrutha has much to be proud ofBrutha has much to be proud ofBrutha has much to be proud ofBrutha has much to be proud ofBrutha has much to be proud of
Default

I don't really think that we need the concept of "blame".

Let's say we have a consensus in our society that those companies cause the cancers.
Now there are a few possibilities:
1) The companies take responsiblity and reduce those effects.
2) The goverment takes responsibility and regulates/bans those chemicals.
3) Some group takes responsibilty and organises a boycot (either peaceful or armed) of those companies to drive them out of business.
In reality it is most of the time a mixture of those. The threat of the goverment taking responsibilty over the problem might drive the companies to take a bit of responsibilty.

That system underlies over democracy and is much more effective than blaming the companies.
In a culture where people blame other people nothing gets done.
Brutha is offline   Reply With Quote