View Single Post
Old 09-10-2007, 03:38 PM   #8 (permalink)
Brutha
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Berlin, Germany
Posts: 4,997
Brutha is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
To do correct risk assessment just to make it through everyday life, though, it seems like a person needs professional-level training in at least the following subjects:
You don't need to be able to do correct risk assessment to be responsible.

Let's say a politican favors minimum wage. He has no clue about the effects of minimum wage on employement and is therefore unable to do a correct risk assessment of whether the minimum wage policy harm employement.
Then he pushes for the minimum wage and creates unemployement as a result.

According to your idea of responsibilty the votes should say in the next election that the politician isn't responsible for the unemployement, because he lacks the ability to correctly assess the risk (if he would have that ability he wouldn't have pushed the policy).

I rather think that that politician is responsible for the unemployment and because of his responsibilty it is less likely that I will vote for him again.

For responsibility to have any meaning it has to apply in those cases where someone is unable to assess the risk of his actions.
__________________
I am always open for feedback on my posts. If your feedback would go offtopic feel free to send me a Personal Message.

My posts generally don't contain medical or legal advice, if you have a problem seek the opinion of an expert


Talking about this in terms of “bad news” or “bad judgment by business leaders” seems archaic. It’s like describing World War One as “a serious diplomatic concern.”
Bruce Sterling about the financial crisis.
Brutha is offline   Reply With Quote