Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael Chui  An important facet seems to be helping those who are beginning to become more conscious with their new perspective(s). |
A couple of posters have suggested that help should only be extended to people above a certain level of Consciousness. Is this really necessary or appropriate? It seems like people at the lowest levels are the ones who need help most.
John, I really like the idea of a "Lightworker" corporation. I suspect great care would have to be taken with the legal side (eg. I believe shareholders have the legal right to sack a CEO for failing to maximise short-term profits - less than ideal for our purposes!), but it has a huge amount of potential. How do you see such a thing working?
re: Crime, it was a poorly chosen word ; substitute "antisocial behaviour". Certainly this would not occur in a 100% Conscious society, but a society cannot realistically be 100% Conscious. There will always people in a society who fall beneath that level (eg. children, the mentally ill, visitors or newcomers to the society, people whose Consciousness level falters due to life events etc.) How would such a society best deal with these people?
How would such a society best deal with disagreement?
BTW, I agree with Tomjen. Separate societies have been tried and failed, but they were not primarily composed of Conscious people. I believe a separate society of Conscious people would be successful. But there are drawbacks to that approach; it creates an 'us' and a 'them' (and thus introduces friction with other societies), it loses the opportunity to directly interact with (and to improve and learn from) current society and it
That's an either/or situation, so I'm guessing there's a third alternative solution that I've missed. Does anyone else have insight as to what it could be?