Quote:
Originally Posted by Mounds  I'm just gonna go ahead and throw this out there: there was never anyone dominating this place.
I've had A LOT of dissenting opinions directed at me in my time of posting and many of them came from active members. All that really meant to me was that they had a different opinion.
And how does someone dominate the forum anyway? What's the criteria there...?
Is it...
... a bigger friends list?
... a higher post count?
... more people agreeing with the other person?
... being a mod vs a regular member?
... having a bigger rep bar?
Maybe we can still explore that if you're interested.
-Tim |
I'd say, being reasonably active, having strong opinions, being informed enough to be able to defend those opinions, and those opinions being shared by a reasonable amount of other active and 'prolific' (noticable) members who can boost them when they voice their opinions by backing them up (the most classic since mid-2010 being: "I wish I could rep you!! <3 <3"). <-- if one has all of those.
I think there were few
domineering members (of those who made a big impact) lately. Well, many could be aggressive but most were reasonable.