[royster]

My reply to Brutha:
Let me first get back to how your statement came about: it was in response to my post on another thread, which has since been locked.

http://www.stevepavlina.com/forums/world-affairs/70713-bill-rights-has-just-been-destroyed-america-almost-dead.html#post1037302

In my post I mention nothing about 9/11 websites. I state rather clearly that researchers cross-reference. You then immediately reply about 9/11 websites. In your favor, I will concur that there are very few reliable 9/11 websites, though they do exist.

In replying to my post in the method you did, you essentially conduct the very behavior I point out, such as diversionary questions that side-track the issue.

royster - Those who research relentlessly and cross-reference facts are often discredited by means of character assassination, and when that doesn't work, a barrage of worthless questions designed to keep the topic running in circles is employed.

In throwing all 9/11 websites into a vague generality of unreliability, you associate me with that discounted group…essentially a ‘character assassination’. With Curtis2011’s comment of hypocrisy, virtually all of my valid points and comments are discounted in such a way as to be invalid.

The thread was locked before I could point this out. Without any explanation, the thread remains locked.

Brutha - Show me a single 911 truth website that does relentless cross-referencing of facts.

If there no such website I think it's fair to generalize it to the whole 911 truth community.

http://www.serendipity.li/

I consider this the oldest and most reliable website for 9/11 Truth.

And 9/11 is very MUCH on-topic for the speculation of war with Iran, because without 9/11, the “war on terror” could not have been initiated with the copious funding and public approval it has received. By the exact same means of association I illustrated above, a war is being electively created.

Brutha - it's fair to generalize

In ANY MATTER which involves life and death, it is NOT “fair” to generalize. In fact, it is in ignoring significant points that agendas are allowed to proceed unrevealed to an undiscerning public. Until the events of 9/11 are satisfactorily explored openly, and legitimate questions answered with transparency, any war or military action that followed 9/11 in the name of "the war on terror" is a crime against humanity, pure and simple.