Quote:
|
That any government agency does anything "without permission" from a superior authority is obviously dubious. That's their cop-out.
|
Basically you think the ex-MI5 person who had her husband imprisioned for months by the British and who blows the wisthile on the story is somehow untrustworthy, because you don't like the story?
Quote:
|
Covert operations are always difficult to uncover, whether by MI5, CIA or anyone else.
|
Uncovering covert operations is a different question. According to your definition an CIA attack on Iran doesn't count as an US attack on Iran if the US president and his advisors didn't know anything about the attack.
That is a different definition than the one that international law uses to determine whether a country attacked another militarily.
Quote:
|
Just because I have no clue how the decisions are made, doesn't mean I can't sense when something fishy is going on (I do have a B.S. meter).
|
Say you have a politician who's against legalizing cannabis because he fear that going that route would open him up to the allegation that doing so makes him appear soft on drugs.
There are politicians that make decisions that way.
Quote:
|
As a fairly intelligent person, with much respect for you, Brutha, I find this contradicts another statement you made:
|
Show me a single 911 truth website that does relentless cross-referencing of facts.
If there no such website I think it's fair to generalize it to the whole 911 truth community.
Quote:
|
If you say "There [are] no 9/11 truth website that relentlessly cross-referrences fact" then you should be able to specifiy about which of those [websites] people in the [Truth movement] you are speaking.
|
If I say there no unicorns than I don't have to point to specific unicorns to prove my point.
I also don't have to point to horses with don't happen to be unicorns. I can just observe that no unicorns exist.