Quote:
Originally Posted by Brutha  Okay, then my make my point more directly:
There are a lot of people in the US. They have all sorts of different interests and persue all sorts of agenda's.
If you say "the US has a secret agenda" then you should be able to specifiy about which of those people in the US you are speaking.
Why is this valuable? Merging all those different interests together into a single ideal actor that's called "the US" is a simplification. That simplication prevents you from seeing how political decisions get made.
Understanding how political decisions get made is the basis for understand motivations for decisions. |
As a fairly intelligent person, with much respect for you, Brutha, I find this contradicts another statement you made:
Quote:
There [are] no 9/11 truth website that relentlessly cross-referrences fact.
It's something that the 9/11 truth community just doesn't do.
|
source:
The Bill of Rights has just been destroyed.. America is almost dead. Allow me to slightly alter your words to stress my point: Merging all those different [9/11 Truth] interests together into a single ideal actor is a simplification. That simplication prevents you from seeing how political decisions get made.
If you say "There [are] no 9/11 truth website that relentlessly cross-referrences fact"
then you should be able to specifiy about which of those [websites] people in the [Truth movement] you are speaking.