View Single Post
Old 12-14-2011, 07:40 PM   #55 (permalink)
Beingist
Family Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,444
Beingist has a reputation beyond reputeBeingist has a reputation beyond reputeBeingist has a reputation beyond reputeBeingist has a reputation beyond reputeBeingist has a reputation beyond reputeBeingist has a reputation beyond reputeBeingist has a reputation beyond reputeBeingist has a reputation beyond reputeBeingist has a reputation beyond reputeBeingist has a reputation beyond reputeBeingist has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Spinoza View Post
Like I said previously the bill does require the Attorney General to work through the court system. Accused parties can address there issues in courts, nothing gets done unless a court approves it...or ie due process is served.

Although there are somethings in the SOPA bill which are a little murky on how it would be handled.
From Wikipedia:
Quote:
The bill also gives immunity to Internet services that voluntarily take action against websites dedicated to infringement [...]
Okay, now, where's the due process in this, again? Where does the Attorney General fit into this scenario?

It's precisely in the "murkiness" of which you speak that due process is lost.
Beingist is offline   Reply With Quote