View Single Post
Old 12-08-2011, 06:39 PM   #27 (permalink)
Beingist
Family Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,444
Beingist has a reputation beyond reputeBeingist has a reputation beyond reputeBeingist has a reputation beyond reputeBeingist has a reputation beyond reputeBeingist has a reputation beyond reputeBeingist has a reputation beyond reputeBeingist has a reputation beyond reputeBeingist has a reputation beyond reputeBeingist has a reputation beyond reputeBeingist has a reputation beyond reputeBeingist has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Spinoza View Post
Errr....what? I only described how things are handled now...not how they would be handled under the new law
Correct, which is why I said that it was valuable information, and why I could see a proposal to amend the current laws (that protect copyright infringement). But this bill doesn't amend the current code, it proposes an entirely new law, and one that subverts due process.
Quote:
and second you haven't described at all how due process is being subverted.
As for how it subverts due process, if you still don't understand how the current bill does that, maybe you could visit my blog at The Daily Chronolog. I explain it there.

Basically, what it does is get ISPs and host sites to participate in shutting down those sites that are merely suspected of infringement, before it's ever proven that they actually are.
Beingist is offline   Reply With Quote