Originally Posted by Beingist
See, I can't relate to what they've been discussing, because I'm in the way of being
mode (as would be implied by the username
Yes, I don't personally see anything terribly confusing bout what you're saying here.
What I get from 'What is, is', IS: There is full acceptance of all and anything that appears. This acceptance is more an absence of doing than a doing. This acceptance flows in the absence of resistance.
I don't see that you are making any statements about what is true or not, simply that there are no exclusions in terms of acceptance..you are not resisting any of it....In fact, If I'm getting it right, you actually are saying you have NO NEED to judge whether something is real or not real, true or not true, good or bad, beneficial or not beneficial...it ALL simply is and as such, it's seen to be perfect........no need
to distance yourself from any of it or to make it stop appearing.
Am I close?