Originally Posted by ZephyrusX
By monopoly of force, are you referring to the military and police? Or are you referring more broadly to authority and the capacity to influence people even if it is against their will? Even if we have a society of highly conscious people who are dedicated towards 'win-win' scenarios, I just don't see answers to our problems that accommodate the wishes of all people and some mechanism of final authority has to be in place whether it is democracy or oligarchy or what have you.
By monopoly on force I'm mainly referring to the rulers using the military and police and not the police and military themselves. Like a monopoly in business, who has the control? CEO or employees? And i agree with your point that you can't accommodate all the people's wishes, which is why at least one group of people always object to government decisions. Human nature does not like to be told what to do but still wants to benefit without effort(for the most part). Anarchy in my opinion is a feasible solution to different preference that humans have.
Edit: For me as an anarchist , I'm perfectly ok with other people's opinions even if they endorse monoarchy, anarchy allows different opinions that are even against the idea itself, it's perfectly fine with anything people have to say.