Quote:
Originally Posted by Anarchist  1. Non-Aggression Principle
The non-aggression principle states that it is morally wrong to initiate(start) force against another human being such as : murder, rape, assault, theft, threatening violence against the victim in order to achieve a goal, ect.
You may use force in self-defense against a person that violates the non-aggression principle. |
That's all well and good on paper. But what would likely happen in real life? What do people do when they lose their loved ones or their relatives? They retaliate. Especially if they think they can get away with it. Violence begets violence and violence is fueled by the idea of:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Anarchist 2.Property Rights
In Property Rights ,you own effects of your actions such as : houses ,cars, money,food,water,businesses, your life, ect.(Except other human beings of course). Basically you are 100% responsible for your life and the stuff you own.
Now the obvious question is, "Who is going uphold these fundamental moral principles?". |
Your answer is your friends? Why should I trust that people will use sound judgement when armed with deadly force? Who's going to make laws regarding gun use, gun licensing and all that? We just sell any weapon to anyone who wants one? Nukes? Bombs?
Within a capitalist framework, inequality would likely increase, which would likely lead to increased violence.
I don't believe we can have anarchy that works with the concepts of property and possession firmly in place. Anarchy needs acceptance, sharing, the elimination of the concepts of class, and a deep change of mindset to work. Sadly I don't think all of that is likely to happen.