This is only logical if a fetus indeed constitutes human life, but when we discussed the issue earlier, you had no response to what I said. Why?
Originally Posted by DerekB
We are merely making the perfectly logical and easily defensible claim that the right to life of the baby is of more importance than nine months of discomfort for the woman.
I don't understand this response as it relates to what I posted.
No, they won't. Some may, I'll grant you, but enough won't that this argument has a flaw in its foundation.