"To be honest, I don't understand this at all. If you are pro-life, by definition, you must see pro-choice people as murderers as you see the fetus as a human being. This, as far as I can see, is the premise of the pro-life position. Conversely, if you are pro-life, you must be anti-woman as you are basically advocating for their legal and reproductive rights to be taken away from them under the unproven assumption that the fetus constitutes a human being."
Pro-Choice people aren't murderers, they are just advocating murder. Murderers are directly involved in abortion(s). You do not have to be anti-woman, this is a line of bull spewed by the left to defame pro-lifers. We are merely making the perfectly logical and easily defensible claim that the right to life of the baby is of more importance than nine months of discomfort for the woman.
"Yes it does. The whole legal battle for reproductive rights was fought in order to alleviate the suffering of women, and by extension, their loved ones. You cannot speak of choices that are divorced from the real world. Women will rationally choose to undergo an illegal abortion and risk their lives and health doing so because they see the consequences of not doing so as potentially incurring greater harm. There is a simple solution for this. Protect the right that women ought to have to control their reproduction via the State. Give women the ability to choose the option that will best meet their physical, emotional and spiritual needs and the needs of their family."
No, they won't. Some may, I'll grant you, but enough won't that this argument has a flaw in its foundation.
|