View Single Post
Old 11-07-2011, 11:07 PM   #613 (permalink)
ZephyrusX
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 4,885
ZephyrusX is shining brightlyZephyrusX is shining brightlyZephyrusX is shining brightlyZephyrusX is shining brightlyZephyrusX is shining brightlyZephyrusX is shining brightlyZephyrusX is shining brightlyZephyrusX is shining brightlyZephyrusX is shining brightlyZephyrusX is shining brightlyZephyrusX is shining brightly
Default

Yes, people can try to impose standards onto others. I do it quite the bit. In WW2 though, we used force to impose those standards. In countries that legalize abortion, you cannot use the force of the State to force the woman to follow your line of morality. Hence the reason you are better off speaking to your sexual partners about this issue if you really believe that it is murder.

I think I get your point though. If a fetus is truly alive, shouldn't we have the moral responsibility to impose our higher standards of morality onto others? If you honestly believe that, yes, I suppose. Hence the rather brutal tactics used by the Pro-Life group at times.

Hence the discussion on what constitutes life, I suppose.

Quote:
Originally Posted by DerekB View Post
People have the right to impose their standards on others in some contexts. We (americans) believe that genocide is wrong. Therefore, we joined WWII and defeated the germans, ending the holocaust. By extending your logic, you're implying that we had no business ending the holocaust and we should've let it continue.

Its called pro-choice because its easier to market than "pro-murder". That doesn't change what it is, it only makes it more palatable for those who would rather not think about the underlying issue.
ZephyrusX is offline   Reply With Quote