Overcoming News Addiction
September 26th, 2006 by Steve Pavlina
Email this article to a friend
A little over 30 days ago, I decided to go on a news fast, using my trusty 30-day trial method. I had already dropped TV news and newspapers, but I still had the habit of checking Yahoo News or CNN every day or two, so for 30 days I decided to drop all news sources and go totally news-free. In this article I’ll share what I learned from this experiment. It went well enough that I intend to remain free of the habit of daily news checking.
Motivation to begin a news fast
I know well enough how negatively biased popular news sources are, but despite this drawback, I figured some news was still better than no news at all. Checking the news was the lesser of two evils. Isn’t it important to keep up on current events? If I dropped all news sources, wouldn’t I be living in darkness, cut off from the rest of humanity?
On the other hand, I always tell people, “You never know what’s on the other side of a belief until you test it for yourself.” I figured it was worth a 30-day trial to find out what news-free living was like. It seemed unlikely I’d miss anything earth-shattering, and I could always catch up afterwards.
Uncovering news addiction
I was surprised at how difficult this trial was from the very beginning. Throughout the first day, I was just itching to check the news. I wanted to find out what was going on in the world. What were the latest updates on the various news threads I’d been following? I was able to stick to my news fast without cheating, but it felt very uncomfortable. I had to delete my news bookmarks to prevent myself from subconsciously checking the news out of habit.
After several more days, I was still itching to check the news. It felt like a craving. I soon realized I wasn’t just dealing with a habit — I was actually tackling an addiction.
Addictions are a deeper form of habit because they fill a need. The need is often important and shouldn’t remain unfilled, but what makes an addiction negative is its destructive side effects. The need my news addiction filled was that it gave me a sense of groundedness by connecting me with what was going on in the world. But the negative side effect was that it was conditioning me to become more negative and fear-based in my thinking.
Control and substitution
The basic solution for overcoming an addiction is control and substitution. First, get temporary control of the addiction, such as by initiating a 30-day period of total abstinence. Secondly, identify the need being filled by the addiction, and find an alternate, non-destructive way to fill that need to at least the same degree.
When I began my 30-day news fast, I didn’t realize I’d be dealing with an addiction. I just thought it was an ingrained habit, so I didn’t make any plans for substitution. However, the substitute behavior naturally fell into place near the end of the 30 days. I’ll get to that in a minute, but first I’ll share some of the realizations I had during the fasting period itself.
Reassessing news reading
After a couple weeks without news, I got past the hump and wasn’t craving it so much anymore. At this point I began reflecting on the habit from a distance, and I made the following observations:
- News is predominantly negative. Which headline gets your attention: “Another blissful day” or “Murderous rampage on the subway”? In order to keep you plugged in, news has to shock you out of your complacency. In practice that means it usually has to scare or worry you. News’ primary marketing method is fear.
- News is addictive. If you’re a daily news junkie, try giving it up for 30 days, and you’ll see what I mean. Even when I just planned to quickly scan the headlines, I’d often get sucked into reading sensationalized articles that provided no real value.
- News is myopic. News provides the illusion of completeness, but in truth its coverage is ridiculously narrow. There are many fascinating happenings in the world that never make the news. After getting your daily update on current events, you think you know what’s going on in the world. But with billions of people on this planet, you’re sorely mistaken. You don’t have a clue.
- News is marketing. Think this; don’t think that. Fear this; worry about that. Yes, yes, we’re all gonna die. Make me feel afraid, so then I’ll buy the sponsors’ products to feel better. Global warming won’t seem so bad when I’m driving my new car and popping my anti-depressants. Pump me full of fear; then sell me the cure.
- News is shallow. Complex topics are reduced to sound bites and simplistic platitudes. Even the “in-depth” stories are unbelievably shallow. Skip the news and read books instead.
- News is untrustworthy. Start looking for the political and corporate agendas behind the stories, and you’ll see them oozing out of every nook and cranny.
- News is thought conditioning. Here’s how to think, so you’ll fit in like a good little human.
- News is trivia. What passes for important is actually far from it. How much of today’s news will you remember next year? Can you even remember last month’s news? Your brain discards the news because it’s trivial; what you internalize is the fear-based conditioning.
- News is redundant. Most news stories are repetitive, redundant, and say the same things twice. Very few stories are actually fresh and new. News should really be called “olds.”
- News is irrelevant. How many news stories are relevant to you personally? Virtually none.
- News isn’t actionable. How many news stories are actionable for you right now? Less than none.
- News is problem-obsessed. The news loves to report problems. It will tell you all the things that are wrong in gory detail. How many of those problems have you actually solved? Which ones are you hard at work solving right now? The news conditions you to worry about problems but not to actually solve them. That’s because you’re encouraged to worry about unsolvable problems and then buy the sponsors’ products to assuage your fears. Drop the news for a while, and you’ll find you naturally spend more time solving problems than worrying about them.
- News is a waste of time. Try to quantify your real gain from news consumption compared to other activities, and you’ll see just how worthless it really is. 10 minutes of news checking per day = 61 hours per year. Over a 50-year period, that’s huge. If you consume 30 minutes of daily news, it’s 183 hours per year – about 23 eight-hour days. That’s a full working month out of every year. Yikes! Was your last year of news consumption worth that much to you? How about a month long vacation instead?
When I stepped back and looked at the big picture, I realized that news was worse than worthless to me. It provides the compelling illusion of valuable, factual information, but when you bite into it, you get nothing but poisoned air. I’m making generalizations here of course, but in my experience they’ve been true much more often than false.
How will I ever live without it?
Maybe news is a predominantly negative influence in its current forms, but what’s the alternative? Don’t we need to keep up on current events? What about “practical” news like technology and science? Even stuff that’s made to seem important really isn’t. Consider some of the stories you might assume are important….
A new breakthrough cancer treatment? I don’t have cancer, nor does anyone in my family. If I did have cancer and was being treated for it, I’d hear about treatments from more intelligent sources than the general news outlets. The news coverage of such treatments is too shallow and pharmaceutical advertiser biased anyway.
A new planet discovered? I’m not an astronaut or an astronomer, so even though this seems like important knowledge, from my perspective it’s still non-actionable trivia. Surely it’s important to NASA, but what’s important for NASA isn’t necessarily relevant to my life purpose. When I’m genuinely interested in improving my astronomy knowledge, I read books written by astrophysicists. Regular news offers astronomy for preschoolers.
A new electronic gadget? New gadgets are nice, but I’ll see friends using them soon enough, or I’ll notice them in local stores. There’s no need to wade through tons of forgettable fluff to learn about one gadget I might someday want. When I feel the need for a new gadget, I can research it proactively and avoid the fluff.
A war update? The combatants involved in various conflicts are neither my enemies nor my allies. Knowing which people killed which other people in which particular manner is useless knowledge to me. War is a complex issue, and the shallow news coverage doesn’t do justice to the true intentions behind the fighting. The information that comes through the news pipe is too biased to be useful.
A major disaster? A normal day on this planet will see 150,000 people die – over a million in a normal week. So how does an earthquake that kills 1000 people compare? That’s not even 1% of one day’s total. A disaster that requires my personal attention will be discovered without the news. During the 1994 Northridge earthquake, the violent shaking of my apartment was a good indication that something was amiss. The news was just as surprised as I was.
There are very few news items that would qualify as a genuine must-read. Sure there are some interesting articles now and then, but I’ve no need for the daily habit of news scanning. The genuinely critical items are nearly nonexistent. If something truly earth-shattering happens, I’m certain to hear about it from someone else anyway.
Substitute behavior
I mentioned earlier that I naturally fell into a substitute behavior that filled the same need as my news addiction. For me that turned out to be spending time in nature. This discovery happened largely by accident – or perhaps by synchronicity.
During my 30-day trial, Erin and I took a vacation trip to Sedona, Arizona. Sedona is one of the most beautiful places I’ve ever visited. I did some hiking, went on a tour with an American Indian guide, and meditated at four of the so-called Sedona energy vortexes (they call them vortexes instead of vortices). It was a wonderful trip, and when it was over, I didn’t want to leave.
On this trip it became obvious that spending more time in nature was a great way to feel grounded. I’d been using the news as a means of grounding myself, but spending time in nature was much more effective. It provided a deeper, more intuitive level of connection than the news’ what-you-don’t-know-might-kill-you approach.
Sedona is 300 miles from Las Vegas, but fortunately Red Rock Canyon is only a 20-minute drive from my house. The week we returned from Sedona, I went hiking in RRC. It’s not as pretty as Sedona, and there are no special energy vortexes, but it’s an effective substitute.
The last time I went hiking (far off trail), I stumbled upon a desert rock that was naturally shaped like a heart. It looked like the surrounding rocks, but it was so obviously heart-shaped that I couldn’t be sure it wasn’t human-chiseled. I decided to take it as a sign, so I put it in my office as a reminder of my connection to the world through nature.
The news cravings are gone now. Instead of feeling connected to the world through current events, I feel connected to the world through the timelessness of nature. This sense of groundedness has much deeper roots, roots that aren’t easily disturbed or manipulated. Standing alone in a natural setting with no man-made structures in sight is a feast for the soul.
News-free living
Perhaps the biggest risk of news-free living is that someday I’ll be lost in my daily routine, completely oblivious to the fact that everyone is evacuating the planet without me. Because I didn’t jack in for months on end, I’ll be totally left behind… just me and my heart-shaped rock.
So in the event of a sudden global evacuation, I ask that you send me a quick courtesy email to let me know. Once that risk is covered, I can comfortably enjoy the rest of my days on this planet sans news media.


September 26th, 2006 at 1:32 pm
[...] I was reading Steve Pavlina’s post “Overcoming News Addiction.” He was off news for 30 days and explored the negative side of news watching. But the only problem is, he concentrated on negative aspects only and swayed to extreme, from new addiction to news fasting. I agree that news is lopsided and presented in certain colour to the reader. But to be an active citizen of any country, news watching/reading is a must. Here I am not talking about the overrated, over exalted generation X, Y or Z. They are busy being more American than Americans themselves. I am talking about normal citizens. [...]
September 27th, 2006 at 1:10 am
[...] Overcoming News Addiction by Steve Pavlina Posted by David Waterston Filed in motivation, self-improvement, brain [...]
September 27th, 2006 at 2:16 am
[...] Steve Pavlina says news is addictive and harmful. The need my news addiction filled was that it gave me a sense of groundedness by connecting me with what was going on in the world. But the negative side effect was that it was conditioning me to become more negative and fear-based in my thinking. [...]
September 27th, 2006 at 9:48 am
Stop Paying Your Attention to Bad News
Yesterday, Steve Pavlina wrote an article about Overcoming News Addiction . I thought the articl
September 27th, 2006 at 10:58 am
[...] For my wife and I, the most important part of these rituals are not the names of the gods or spirits we invoke, but the sense of awe and reverence that the rituals evoke in us and the children. When I was growing up, the only way we marked the changing seasons was by turning off the air conditioner and turning on the heater. We might as well have been living in a space capsule. Connection with nature can provide a vital sense of grounding, as Steve Pavlina points out here. For a druid, nature is the direct link with the eternal. [...]
September 27th, 2006 at 11:29 am
[...] I’ve got more than a touch of news addiction. Hi. My name is Sean Oelkers, and I’ve got a full-fledged case of information overload. [...]
September 27th, 2006 at 11:57 am
[...] From time to time I find Steve Pavlina’s blog perfectly coincides with something important. Like the previous blog’s links to his posts on becoming an early riser and polyphasic sleeping, here’s another apt post: Overcoming News Addiction. When I stepped back and looked at the big picture, I realized that news was worse than worthless to me. It provides the compelling illusion of valuable, factual information, but when you bite into it, you get nothing but poisoned air. [...]
September 27th, 2006 at 12:37 pm
[...] The News – Steve Pavlina does an incredible job of describing how he went from watching the news every day to not watching it at all, and the positive effects that it has had on his life. I recommend you consider doing the same! [...]
September 27th, 2006 at 1:00 pm
[...] Update: Steve Pavlina has a bit to say on overcoming news addiction. [...]
September 27th, 2006 at 2:38 pm
News Fasting
It’s so cool when I have an idea all by my lonesome, and then find out that some other person has had the same idea all by theirs. I believe it’s a sign of Universal Truth.
Such is the case with part of Assignment #2.
I believe one of…
September 28th, 2006 at 9:32 am
[...] Steve Pavlina recently wrote about his 30 day news fast trial that he has decided to continue with indefinitely. Despite his excellent points, I’d like to write a post disagreeing with Steve on the matter. [...]
September 29th, 2006 at 9:47 pm
When the student is ready…
…the teacher will come. I am feeling like a student, going back to basics and having all the learning messages come my way without really seeking them. (I’m thinking this is synchronicity, or the Universe listening…). Let me explain… It’s
October 4th, 2006 at 9:59 am
[...] Steve Pavlina has posted a brilliant analysis of news addiction and his discoveries made on a 30 day news fast, which he chronicles here. [...]
October 5th, 2006 at 12:43 pm
[...] Steve Pavlina reports on his experiences of going news free. In fact, he calls it “overcoming news addiction.” He lists some very good reasons to go news free. [...]
October 6th, 2006 at 5:23 am
[...] Een maand lang zonder nieuws… gruwel… Het zou niets voor mij zijn, maar de Amerikaan Steve Pavlina waagde zich aan het experiment. In zijn artikel Overcoming News Addiction vertelt hij erover. De eerste dagen had de man het heel moeilijk met het negeren van de actualiteit. Steve besloot daaruit dat hij verslaafd was aan nieuws en dringend moest afkicken. Wel, ik ben ook verslaafd aan nieuws, maar heb vooralsnog niet de neiging mijn nieuwsverbruik te minderen. [...]
October 9th, 2006 at 1:11 pm
[...] Overnevnte liste er med forfatterens tillatelse løst oversatt fra Steve Pavlina’s blogpost om når han levde uten nyheter i 30 dager. [...]
October 14th, 2006 at 8:50 am
[...] If you want some tips to rid yourself of the daily news addiction, read this. [...]
October 21st, 2006 at 3:33 pm
[...] So you can see how powerful it is, to be able to choose how you percieve your reality. To some extent, everyone has perceptions of reality that they take as fact. For example, you may watch the news every night, with its endless parade of deaths and sadness, and you may feel you have to, because it’s important to know what’s going on in the world. Yet these tragedies and violent events are only a tiny, tiny part of what’s going on in the world. What about the billions of people around the world who had a perfectly fine day today? Thinking you “have” to pay attention to something negative is just as silly as believing you “have” to pay attention to your left big toe! Imagined if you focused on your big toe for an hour every night! And you felt like you needed to do it because otherwise, you won’t know what’s really going on with your body. Of course, you don’t need to pay active attention to your toe – if something is wrong with it, it will let you know on its own! The same is true of the news, or anything else. (For more reasons not to watch the news, check out these two articles by Erin and Steve Pavlina) [...]
October 27th, 2006 at 9:39 am
[...] Me ha llamado la atención un artículo de Javier Malonda que a su vez referencia a uno de Steve Paulina sobre la adicción a las noticias. [...]
December 24th, 2006 at 10:06 pm
[...] There are other activities that I try to do regularly, but the point is that I have my fingers in a lot of pies. It’s impossible to do everything that I want to do in a day, or even in a week. I’m not the only one in that boat, of course. Some people are good at managing their time. Some people make a lot of money telling people how to do it. Time management is one of Steve Pavlina’s regular topics on his self-help blog, where he gives tips on such specifics as overcoming news addiction, tripling your reading speed, and setting achievable goals. Everyone could benefit from being more able to manage their time. [...]
February 10th, 2007 at 10:12 pm
[...] I was having a chat with my friend tonight when he mentioned that he is on a “news diet”. A “news diet” is when you go without the news for an extended period of time. He got the idea from a blog that he usually reads and I think the author made a lot of great points. If you like, you can check it out here. [...]
March 3rd, 2007 at 7:15 am
[...] Sometime before Christmas I dug up a Steve Pavlina article on overcoming news addiction which prompted me to go without my daily dose of depression. My Business Studies teacher back in high school stressed that we should read the newspaper every day and stay on top of current affairs, but Pavlina lists 13 reasons to the contrary including my favorites: News is irrelevant. How many news stories are relevant to you personally? Virtually none. [...]
November 16th, 2007 at 5:09 am
[...] Steve Pavlina: Overcoming News Addiction [...]
August 30th, 2008 at 12:48 pm
[...] Steve Pavilina puts it best of all, saying news is negative, addictive, myopic, marketing, shallow, untrustworthy, thought [...]
September 7th, 2008 at 8:35 am
[...] Update: Steve Pavlina has a bit to say on overcoming news addiction. [...]