Blog Comments
October 14th, 2005 by Steve Pavlina
Email this article to a friend
After experimenting with having blog comments turned off for a couple weeks now, I’ve decided to keep it this way. I thought it would be a tough decision, but after having tested it for a while, it actually wasn’t a tough decision at all. While comments provide a wonderful degree of interactivity with many obvious benefits, I found them not to be worth the effort, especially as traffic grew. Many of those benefits can be gotten in other ways. First, I already get plenty of feedback via email, so the feedback channel is still there, and anything critical always comes to me redundantly via email anyway. Secondly, I can always re-enable comments for individual posts where the purpose is to invite feedback and/or discussion. Thirdly, I’ve kept trackbacks enabled (at least for new posts), so the mechanism for continuing discussions on other blogs is still there.
The main factor in making this decision was the time and energy freed up by not having to deal with comments. No blog comments means no administration of comments, handling comment spam, legal liability for what people post in comments, having to decide whether to respond to questions or ignore them, people posting false information, commenters flaming other commenters, marketing abuses, tech support for comments (Can you fix my typo? Can you delete my double post?). These are minor problems if you only get a few comments a week, but with more than 10 a day — every day — it quickly adds up.
Such a large volume of feedback gets overwhelming at times, and it has a tendency to exaggerate the importance of certain issues in my mind. Well below 1% of visitors ever post a comment, yet this is the voice that seems the loudest, even though it may be unrepresentative of the whole.
Some people suggested that negative comments were a factor in this decision. No, I can’t say that was a factor for me, at least not directly. I knew before I started this site that there would always be plenty of criticism, and I never view criticism of my writing as a personal attack, especially from people I’ve never even met. I had to deal with plenty of that while running my games business too. When an audience reaches a certain size, negative feedback is inevitable. My main concern with respect to criticism isn’t whether or not I can handle it, but whether or not it’s worthwhile to host it publicly. Does it do myself or anyone else much good? I can think of many instances where I felt criticism was helpful (either to myself or to others), but most of the time it has to do more with what the other person is experiencing in their life than in what I’m actually writing about. A good portion of criticism is simply the other person projecting my writing onto their own context and then responding negatively to that projection. But this doesn’t just apply to criticism — it also applies to positive or neutral feedback. Many times I get positive feedback about a post that suggested the person misunderstood it entirely yet still got something worthwhile from their own errant projection. But given that these comments don’t alter my course of action, there isn’t much point in maintaining them. So there’s nothing specific about negative comments that aren’t also an issue for positive comments.
The opportunity cost is a key factor as well. Even when you take the benefits of hosting blog comments by themselves (such as the interactivity and the community-building elements), you still have to ask if it’s the best use of time and energy. While it might be a good use, for me it’s clearly not the best. In addition to the low percentage of visitors who actually post comments, less than 10% of visitors actually read them. So the effort of comments serves to support only a tiny slice of the total community, although it’s obviously an important and vocal slice. Also, whenever there’s a surge in traffic from certain sites that have little or nothing to do with personal development, there’s invariably an explosion of juvenile comments that have little or nothing to do with the original post. As this is intended to be a site “for smart people” who take personal development seriously, I think having too many comments like those weakens the site overall.
I also realized that if the community-building aspects were what I wanted, then I should put up a full-blown message board. Blog comments are sort of a limbo in that respect, particularly for a site that gets enough traffic to easily maintain a popular online forum. But having run a forum for a while on another site, I decided that wasn’t something I wanted to do here, at least not at the present time.
After having tried life without comments for a while, I’m confident this is the best decision overall. I’ve been feeling a lot more focused lately, better able to keep a perspective on what’s most important. And I can write with deeper concentration, not being concerned about all the comments that may misinterpret some idea or take one sentence out of context.
Blog Comments R.I.P.
Oct 1, 2004 - Sep 28, 2005


October 15th, 2005 at 7:42 am
[…] Pointing to Steve Pavlina’s decision to turn comments off on his Blog, Darren asks “Would you ever consider switching off the comments on your blog?” […]
July 31st, 2006 at 8:21 am
[…] I’m not sure how active I’ll be in the forums myself. I was very active in the games forums I ran, and I liked the interaction, but it was a significant time investment. I want these forums to be a place for many-to-many interaction, not merely a substitute for blog comments. As I explained here and here, I found blog comments to be a poor choice for community building for this site. I’ll play it by ear and see how much time I have to contribute to the forums once they’re up and running. I don’t want to remain aloof, since I’d love the chance to get to know some of you better. […]
August 3rd, 2006 at 9:18 pm
[…] I read Steve Pavlina’s article about shutting down comments, where he notes that only a small percentage of his readers bother to read comments, and an even smaller percentage ever post a comment. His reasoning that spending time and energy on moderating comments for a relatively small group is not the best use of either his time or energy. I agree, I would much rather see more of his excellent articles than have him deal with unruly commenters. […]
November 4th, 2006 at 1:46 pm
[…] I feel this is a great replacement for blog comments, which I turned off nearly a year ago for the reasons stated here and here. With the forums I don’t have to worry about comment spam, and I don’t have to personally moderate comments since they now fall under the domain of the forum moderators. Forum posts are instantly approved by default, so discussions will be more efficient than when I was manually approving blog comments. The forums require a one-time free registration to be able to post, which shouldn’t discourage long-term visitors who really want to discuss these topics, but which should be just enough to deter most drive-by trolls. Furthermore, the forums have a ton of features that make online discussions far superior to any blog commenting system I’ve seen, regardless of the number of plug-ins. […]
December 7th, 2006 at 10:26 am
[…] Steve Pavlina – His feeling is that as your traffic grows it becomes time consuming to maintain the comments, and because the small handful of people that comment don’t represent the overall view off your mass readership, it can end up taking you off course. Steve also mentions other alternatives, such as e-mails, forums and opening certain post to commenting when desired. […]
December 13th, 2006 at 9:12 pm
[…] Steve Pavlina decided to shut off comments to his blog and makes a good case for disabling comments on the Blog Comments post. Casey Serin experimented with turning off moderation on his blog and got bombarded with nasty, inappropriate comments. He had to delete 162 of them! See his first comment in the 24hr-Facing Foreclose Fast post. Not to mention having to deal with spam. Is it worth going through all this trouble? […]
June 9th, 2007 at 5:29 am
[…] I wrote a couple articles about why I turned them off: http://www.stevepavlina.com/blog/2005/10/blog-comments/ and http://www.stevepavlina.com/blog/2005/10/more-on-blog-comments/ […]
July 17th, 2007 at 10:01 am
[…] Back in October 2005, Steve Pavlina explained the benefits of switching off comments on his blog, being confident that it was a good decision. However, one year later, Steve associates a forum to his blog, allowing the community to interact even more. It seems that he missed the comments, after all. […]
October 23rd, 2007 at 3:11 am
[…] Steve Pavlina says, “sometimes on a post-by-post basis, but generally no.” […]
January 5th, 2008 at 2:04 pm
[…] I’m fans of both Godin and Pavlina and read their “blogs” frequently. But it grates a bit to see them be so far-removed from the conversationalist atmosphere they both once were a part of - and yet able to still displace legitimate bloggers in Technorati’s ranking. As an example, they both have taken rather celebrity attitudes about why they turned off their comments. It actually wasn’t a tough decision at all. While comments provide a wonderful degree of interactivity with many obvious benefits, I found them not to be worth the effort, especially as traffic grew. - Steve Pavlina (Sep 28, 2005) […]