You Have the Right to Be Wrong
July 20th, 2005 by Steve Pavlina
Email this article to a friend
“You have the right to be wrong” was a common expression of an old high school history teacher of mine. Some students hated this teacher because they thought he was lazy and a bit sadistic. He never lectured, nor did he ever seem to have a lesson plan prepared. He’d just sit back in his chair, sometimes putting his feet up on his desk, and then he’d ask probing questions and insult whoever attempted to answer them (usually for their lack of individual thought).
For homework he’d assign us lots of dry reading material, and then we’d have to write very brief papers on complex subjects, like a two-page, double-spaced paper about the causes of the Civil War. Believe me — this is a lot harder than writing a 5-10 page paper on the subject because you have to choose your words very carefully. Otherwise you’ll run out of space before you make a dent in the topic. Two pages was the maximum you’d be allowed to write. If you wrote 2.1 pages, you’d fail the assignment. “Verbal flabbiness” wasn’t allowed.
Despite his lack of popularity, this teacher had the stated goal of teaching students to think for themselves instead of merely regurgitating information we learned elsewhere. This is tough to do with 17-year olds, especially with a subject like U.S. history.
I thought the expression, “you have the right to be wrong,” while usually meant as a joke in this class, was good advice. It’s not in the Bill of Rights, but perhaps it can be considered a basic human right. You have the right to be wrong. You have the right to make mistakes. You have the right to fail.
Many people don’t see the value in exercising this right, however. I think this is also a major component in the fear of public speaking. What if you take a stand on something, and you’re shot down, proven utterly wrong?
What’s so terrible about being wrong? If you’re never wrong, to me that indicates you aren’t growing. I hope that five years from now, I’ll look back on some of my blog posts from this year and disagree with myself. Otherwise it would mean that either I haven’t grown or that I was too timid in expressing myself.
Don’t be afraid to take stabs at the edges of your certainty. That’s one of the best ways to learn. Let others react to your ideas. Sometimes they’ll help provide new facts that can allow you to refine your ideas. Other times they’ll merely react emotionally which can help you become more resilient in weathering other people’s emotions. Don’t be afraid to put out your ideas in a conversation, a speech, an article, a blog entry, a forum post — any communication where you can get feedback from others.
Take your ego out of the picture
I think people resist being wrong because they equate their ideas with their ego. So if their ideas get shot down, they treat it as a personal defeat — they feel humiliated. The feedback from others may even encourage this reaction: “Boy, you really blew it tonight.” But just because others equate your ideas with your identity doesn’t mean you’re obligated to do so as well.
Over-investing your ego in your results is unproductive and unnecessary. If you think the failure of your ideas is a personal failure, you’ll take too few risks, risks that could ultimately pay off. But if you can learn to separate yourself from your ideas and your work and see them as something separate from yourself, you’ll feel you truly have the right to be wrong. If an idea fails, why not let it be the idea’s fault instead of your own? Allow your ideas to fail without turning them into personal defeat.
When I write articles or give speeches, I do my best to remove my ego from any attachment to the results. Ideas are ideas — they are not me. Even if I’m relating personal stories, those stories are still not equal to the real me. They’re merely words. If I give a speech and get a lousy reaction, the reaction might be due to my lack of skill as a speaker. But again, my skills are not equal to the real me. My ideas and skills are merely possessions or creations, but they don’t define the real me. Thus, I never feel my ego is in any danger if a speech or an article bombs.
If an idea seems to really hit the mark, I don’t take it as a personal victory either. I just think… hey, that’s appears to be a good idea. If an idea misses the mark, I see if there’s any helpful feedback and then may refine or abandon the idea. Or it could be that I felt the idea wasn’t expressed well enough and missed its mark due to being poorly communicated. To me it’s all just feedback to create better ideas and to improve communication skills.
I think this attitude is what helps make it very easy for me to give a speech without nervousness and to write regularly for an audience of tens of thousands of readers. I feel it’s perfectly fine for me to be wrong. When discussing a complex subject like personal growth, there are many shades of gray. Despite all the knowledge and experience I have in this area, there’s no way I could ever hope to perfectly understand every facet of this vast field. Plus my communication skills are invariably imprecise. Effective communication requires a combination of logic and emotion, and those are sometimes at odds with each other and will impact different individuals uniquely. I know of no great speakers or writers who ever achieve unanimous agreement when they communicate anything of value. By keeping ego out of the picture, you can do as Winston Churchill suggested — move from one failure to the next with no loss of enthusiasm.
How could you better exercise your right to be wrong? Have you been afraid to hit the gym because you don’t know what to do and expect that you will only look like an idiot? Don’t put your ego on the line — remember that it’s only your skills that are lacking. You are not lacking as a human being just because you lack certain knowledge and skill. Where else could you take a stab at being wrong or ignorant where the only long-term consequence would be a bruised ego (and not even that if you leave your ego behind)?
You have the right to be wrong. Let your ideas fail, let your skills prove their inadequacy, and let your knowledge reveal its limits. None of that is the real you anyway.
When you fail you discover your boundaries. You map out the edges of your capabilities. And this allows you to eventually move beyond them.
Being wrong eventually leads to being right. And even where it doesn’t, it’s still a more interesting path than being nothing.


July 20th, 2005 at 6:01 am
Steve, you wrote a great article this morning. The need to be right can cloud good judgement. The right to be wrong is liberating. Your high school teacher resembles one that I had. I wonder if these older, crusty teachers were given the same handbook when they took teacher training.
July 20th, 2005 at 6:18 am
Toastmasters: A Place To Make Mistakes
No one likes to make mistakes. But they happen and they are often accompanied with pain and remorse. When they happen in front of an audience they can be truly devastating. Many people are deathly afraid of public speaking because of a previous failure…
July 20th, 2005 at 6:19 am
I think I saw you said you don’t want to repeat what already exist (I may be wrong!). But there is topic, like this one, that need to be repeated (as your post about the basic). That is in no-way a criticism, but just to point out to people that may just go check everything you say. It is easy to contradict someone on a lot of words
I’m one of those person that people often think I don’t want to be wrong, etc. etc. But in fact I am probably one of those who accept the fact that I am wrong very easily — even if I pursue “rightness” and performance, etc. etc.
The reason that it shocks people, it is that when I am right (or think I am), I will discuss a lot till I find my answer. Meaning that if I am convinced I am right, either me or the other side doesn’t get something and if I am proved wrong, I accept it and doesn’t make a big game out of it. Actually I enjoy to be proved wrong when I am, so I can learn something, improve, think diffferently, etc. (Of course there is topic where there is multiple good answer :D)
Another way to think of that topic and you also well covered it, it is that if you try to never do mistake, you will advance only very slowly, as you will be very precautious of anything (and in the end, that might be considered also as an error, but in another aspect — like productivity, performance, growth, etc.) — if you run a lot faster (taking risk)… you will eventually hit wall, it may hurt a lot, but chance are you will be already ahead, and you will have time to think and find a way to go back on the right path to go more further.
July 20th, 2005 at 12:58 pm
So what does define the person if above is removed?
July 20th, 2005 at 3:11 pm
@Jim: In my opinion what defines you as a person is your consciousness. Your consciousness gives you the capability of self-definition by choosing your thoughts. So if you associate the failure of your ideas as a personal failure, then you use your own consciousness against itself (to define yourself as a failure). But despite the popularity of this negative approach, it isn’t necessary. Regardless of what happens to your ideas, you can still use your consciousness to create an empowering self-definition that allows you to continue to grow.
July 20th, 2005 at 5:05 pm
I’m willing to be found wrong. I just don’t care. I’m usually after a specific tangible goal.
But some don’t see things this way. For some people, the goal is to be seen by others as being right. One of the most annoying things when debating/discussing things with these kinds of people is challenging an idea and having them in turn get offended. They can’t differentiate criticism of the *idea* from an ad hominem attack. Or worse, if they “prove” your idea wrong, they take a ridiculous amount of smug self satisfaction over it and it’s like they expect you to get on your knees to worship at the altar of their greatness.
Of course these are often the same people living a boring, unsatisfying “safe” life, who take ridiculous satisfaction out of the stumbles of someone who actually shoots for something greater. Petty things like this have way too much meaning for them.
“Tsk tsk tsk. I told him not to try opening that store. Too risky. He should have stuck with that nice boring job he had. NOW look at him…”
Sometimes I want to go to sleep and be woken up at the next phase of human evolution.
July 20th, 2005 at 7:18 pm
I suppose that is why Pride made the short list of Deadly Sins and humility is to be revered?
July 20th, 2005 at 9:07 pm
Great article! Please keep these coming.
Why is not the full text of this article available in the RSS feed? I like this blog a lot and genuinely enjoy these wonderful moments in the evenings when I turn on my notebook and drop into my RSS reader to read it along with 9 other blogs I think are the most interesting blogs on this planet (yes, this blog is in my top 10!), but alas, today all I got of this article was a single paragraph and a link to the website. Ouch!
Could not you return back to publishing the full text of each article via RSS? I find it much better and much more efficient to read blogs using an RSS reader. If I were to read blogs using a browser, I would have been unable to keep up with the new posts and would probably have had to cut the top 10 blogs I read every day to something like the top 3!
I think many of the readers of this blog also value the efficiency of reading blogs using an RSS reader (as in, get done more in less time) and would welcome the return to a full text feed.
Thanks for listening!
July 21st, 2005 at 12:19 am
I guess that’s why I love the quote: ‘God, spare me the need for love, approval or appreciation’ (from Byron Katie, theWork.org).
If I observe myself and see how often I am not true to my own ideas and opinions and not honest about them just to preserve another’s good opinion about me….
Ah well, I’m learning. Slowly though.
July 21st, 2005 at 11:07 am
Couldn’t agree more. The willingness to change my mind (implicitely admitting that I was wrong) is an essential part of growth. As Luke writes in Acts 17.11, “Now the Bereans were of more noble character than the Thessalonians, for they received the message with great eagerness and examined the Scriptures every day to see if what Paul said was true.”
July 23rd, 2005 at 4:56 am
Hi,
Accel Band,
Would it be possible for you to list your favourite top ten blogs.
If you appreciate this blog, then i’m sure your other choices would be worth a look.
Kind regards