<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Read a Book a Week</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stevepavlina.com/blog/2005/02/read-a-book-a-week/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stevepavlina.com/blog/2005/02/read-a-book-a-week/</link>
	<description>Personal Development for Smart People</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 05:30:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: t2701</title>
		<link>http://www.stevepavlina.com/blog/2005/02/read-a-book-a-week/#comment-3251</link>
		<dc:creator>t2701</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2005 19:26:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stevepavlina.com/blog/2005/02/read-a-book-a-week/#comment-3251</guid>
		<description>Marc, then maybe you should read some of the other posts by Steve. He's all about action. He loathes procrastination. That's why he's into the whole multitasking thing. 
Try reading http://www.dexterity.com/articles/do-it-now.htm

Appropriate action is great and everything but reading makes decision making easier.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marc, then maybe you should read some of the other posts by Steve. He&#8217;s all about action. He loathes procrastination. That&#8217;s why he&#8217;s into the whole multitasking thing.<br />
Try reading <a href="http://www.dexterity.com/articles/do-it-now.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.dexterity.com/articles/do-it-now.htm</a></p>
<p>Appropriate action is great and everything but reading makes decision making easier.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc</title>
		<link>http://www.stevepavlina.com/blog/2005/02/read-a-book-a-week/#comment-1275</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Mar 2005 21:46:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stevepavlina.com/blog/2005/02/read-a-book-a-week/#comment-1275</guid>
		<description>While I fully subscribe to your analysis, I have one nagging doubt. I sometimes fear that all this reading is an form of procrastination. As long as you can tell yourself that you're in the process of acquiring knowlegde and insight around certain problems, you have an excuse not to start taking action. "Yes, I know it's time to tackle this problem, but let me first read this one more book that will help me approaching it just that little bit better..."

The challenge lies in starting to act, even knowing that your skill and knowledge can always be improved, but that starting in an imperfect way is better than waiting for the ultimate perfection. Which we all know never comes...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I fully subscribe to your analysis, I have one nagging doubt. I sometimes fear that all this reading is an form of procrastination. As long as you can tell yourself that you&#8217;re in the process of acquiring knowlegde and insight around certain problems, you have an excuse not to start taking action. &#8220;Yes, I know it&#8217;s time to tackle this problem, but let me first read this one more book that will help me approaching it just that little bit better&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>The challenge lies in starting to act, even knowing that your skill and knowledge can always be improved, but that starting in an imperfect way is better than waiting for the ultimate perfection. Which we all know never comes&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Saurier Duval</title>
		<link>http://www.stevepavlina.com/blog/2005/02/read-a-book-a-week/#comment-854</link>
		<dc:creator>Saurier Duval</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2005 21:04:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stevepavlina.com/blog/2005/02/read-a-book-a-week/#comment-854</guid>
		<description>Great post! I started to adopt the work-/infoflow you state in comment #2 and this seems to work really well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post! I started to adopt the work-/infoflow you state in comment #2 and this seems to work really well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Pavlina</title>
		<link>http://www.stevepavlina.com/blog/2005/02/read-a-book-a-week/#comment-851</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Pavlina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2005 20:09:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stevepavlina.com/blog/2005/02/read-a-book-a-week/#comment-851</guid>
		<description>Our brain doesn't multitask well?  Nonsense.  How many different functions is your brain performing right now?  Hundreds?

While it might be unproductive to multitask multiple mental tasks, a mental and a physical can easily be performed together.  Many athletic events certainly require a real-time blending of both.

Any reduction in efficiency of multitasking compared to single handling is hugely overshadowed by the overall increase in efficiency.  If you score 1.0 for doing a task by itself, but two tasks done together are reduced to 0.9 each, you're way ahead at 1.8, meaning your overall return from multitasking is 80% higher.  If I read while on the exercise bike, I may not pedal as hard, and I may not read with as much concentration, but I'd say that it's only about a 10% difference for each task compared to single handling.  In fact, I sometimes feel I concentrate better at reading while on the bike.  So I'll glady take the gain.

Maybe it just takes practice.  I've been doing this kind of multitasking for over a decade, so it's second nature.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our brain doesn&#8217;t multitask well?  Nonsense.  How many different functions is your brain performing right now?  Hundreds?</p>
<p>While it might be unproductive to multitask multiple mental tasks, a mental and a physical can easily be performed together.  Many athletic events certainly require a real-time blending of both.</p>
<p>Any reduction in efficiency of multitasking compared to single handling is hugely overshadowed by the overall increase in efficiency.  If you score 1.0 for doing a task by itself, but two tasks done together are reduced to 0.9 each, you&#8217;re way ahead at 1.8, meaning your overall return from multitasking is 80% higher.  If I read while on the exercise bike, I may not pedal as hard, and I may not read with as much concentration, but I&#8217;d say that it&#8217;s only about a 10% difference for each task compared to single handling.  In fact, I sometimes feel I concentrate better at reading while on the bike.  So I&#8217;ll glady take the gain.</p>
<p>Maybe it just takes practice.  I&#8217;ve been doing this kind of multitasking for over a decade, so it&#8217;s second nature.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.stevepavlina.com/blog/2005/02/read-a-book-a-week/#comment-850</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2005 19:53:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stevepavlina.com/blog/2005/02/read-a-book-a-week/#comment-850</guid>
		<description>Steve, our brain is not multitasked.

If you do other activity while you're reading, your brain has difficulty to stock informations and think about it. 

Even if you are better than others in multitasking, your brain will be more efficient while doing only one activity at the same time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve, our brain is not multitasked.</p>
<p>If you do other activity while you&#8217;re reading, your brain has difficulty to stock informations and think about it. </p>
<p>Even if you are better than others in multitasking, your brain will be more efficient while doing only one activity at the same time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephan Fassmann</title>
		<link>http://www.stevepavlina.com/blog/2005/02/read-a-book-a-week/#comment-849</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephan Fassmann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2005 17:35:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stevepavlina.com/blog/2005/02/read-a-book-a-week/#comment-849</guid>
		<description>Expanding ignorance. I totally understand that. The more I read the less I seem to know:) I remember people blasting Ashcroft about his unknown-unknown comment, maybe they are the types that came to the font of knowledge and just gargled and spat.

I use reading as a mental warm up for the day and it really helps me make decisions faster and with all the extra data, hopefully better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Expanding ignorance. I totally understand that. The more I read the less I seem to know:) I remember people blasting Ashcroft about his unknown-unknown comment, maybe they are the types that came to the font of knowledge and just gargled and spat.</p>
<p>I use reading as a mental warm up for the day and it really helps me make decisions faster and with all the extra data, hopefully better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Pavlina</title>
		<link>http://www.stevepavlina.com/blog/2005/02/read-a-book-a-week/#comment-845</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Pavlina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2005 03:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stevepavlina.com/blog/2005/02/read-a-book-a-week/#comment-845</guid>
		<description>I learned the Evelyn Wood speedreading approach many years ago from a speedreading software program.  It takes practice and discipline, but it does work.  Do a search on "evelyn wood" to find plenty of books and other resources.  Sometimes I use it (especially with fiction), but other times I read more slowly to spend more time digesting and thinking about the ideas, especially if I'm taking notes and planning to apply them.  The denser the book's content (in terms of interesting ideas), usually the longer I take to read it.  I always speedread magazine or newspaper articles though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I learned the Evelyn Wood speedreading approach many years ago from a speedreading software program.  It takes practice and discipline, but it does work.  Do a search on &#8220;evelyn wood&#8221; to find plenty of books and other resources.  Sometimes I use it (especially with fiction), but other times I read more slowly to spend more time digesting and thinking about the ideas, especially if I&#8217;m taking notes and planning to apply them.  The denser the book&#8217;s content (in terms of interesting ideas), usually the longer I take to read it.  I always speedread magazine or newspaper articles though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sri</title>
		<link>http://www.stevepavlina.com/blog/2005/02/read-a-book-a-week/#comment-844</link>
		<dc:creator>sri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2005 02:44:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stevepavlina.com/blog/2005/02/read-a-book-a-week/#comment-844</guid>
		<description>Many times I feel that I take too long to read a book.
Have you (or anyone else) taken a speed reading course?

I have looked into it, but haven't fully committed 
myself to it.  Do you have any techniques
(and/or books/programsw) that'll help me read faster?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many times I feel that I take too long to read a book.<br />
Have you (or anyone else) taken a speed reading course?</p>
<p>I have looked into it, but haven&#8217;t fully committed<br />
myself to it.  Do you have any techniques<br />
(and/or books/programsw) that&#8217;ll help me read faster?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Pavlina</title>
		<link>http://www.stevepavlina.com/blog/2005/02/read-a-book-a-week/#comment-841</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Pavlina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2005 23:42:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stevepavlina.com/blog/2005/02/read-a-book-a-week/#comment-841</guid>
		<description>"Are there other steps which I just haven’t thought of yet?"

Listening.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Are there other steps which I just haven’t thought of yet?&#8221;</p>
<p>Listening.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chad Pavliska</title>
		<link>http://www.stevepavlina.com/blog/2005/02/read-a-book-a-week/#comment-840</link>
		<dc:creator>Chad Pavliska</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2005 22:36:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stevepavlina.com/blog/2005/02/read-a-book-a-week/#comment-840</guid>
		<description>The great posts just keep coming... thanks. This reminds me about something that has been evolving in my mind for the past several years.  It seems to me that the path to enlightenment always comes back to two basic skills... the ability to read and write.  If you think about it, the essence of being human is our ability to communicate and learn from each other.  

It seems to me that the first skill one must master is the ability to read (speed x comprehension = ability level).  Committing to a book a week and excercising reading skills is a great first step.  

The second skill, which follows reading in my experience, is the ability to write.  Keeping a journal or your thoughts, a blog, or taking notes of your reading material are natural next steps.  What are your opinions on this?  Aside from this blog, what other types of writing do you prefer?

Lastly, it just occurred to me that speaking might be the natural third step... can you form clear, concise thoughts and then convey them to others in an efficient way?  

Are there other steps which I just haven't thought of yet?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The great posts just keep coming&#8230; thanks. This reminds me about something that has been evolving in my mind for the past several years.  It seems to me that the path to enlightenment always comes back to two basic skills&#8230; the ability to read and write.  If you think about it, the essence of being human is our ability to communicate and learn from each other.  </p>
<p>It seems to me that the first skill one must master is the ability to read (speed x comprehension = ability level).  Committing to a book a week and excercising reading skills is a great first step.  </p>
<p>The second skill, which follows reading in my experience, is the ability to write.  Keeping a journal or your thoughts, a blog, or taking notes of your reading material are natural next steps.  What are your opinions on this?  Aside from this blog, what other types of writing do you prefer?</p>
<p>Lastly, it just occurred to me that speaking might be the natural third step&#8230; can you form clear, concise thoughts and then convey them to others in an efficient way?  </p>
<p>Are there other steps which I just haven&#8217;t thought of yet?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Pavlina</title>
		<link>http://www.stevepavlina.com/blog/2005/02/read-a-book-a-week/#comment-838</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Pavlina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2005 19:06:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stevepavlina.com/blog/2005/02/read-a-book-a-week/#comment-838</guid>
		<description>When I get new ideas from books I want to act on, I jot them down on a scrap of paper and toss them into my inbox.  Then when I process my inbox, those ideas get incorporated into my personal management system, so they either end up as "someday/maybe" items to consider in the future, or they become new projects or tasks, which could include simply journaling about the idea to explore it more deeply and to generate ideas for how to apply it.  To know and not to do is not to know.  If you learn a new idea and don't act on it, you haven't really learned it.

About 1/4 of the books I read are fiction.  Some are fictional philosophy or spirituality like Ayn Rand's &lt;i&gt;Atlas Shrugged&lt;/i&gt; or James Redfield's &lt;i&gt;Celestine Prophecy&lt;/i&gt; books, but most are just pure fiction.  Last year I read Piers Anthony's &lt;i&gt;Incarnations of Immortality&lt;/i&gt; series (7 books), which I really enjoyed.  I also liked &lt;i&gt;The Da Vinci Code&lt;/i&gt;.  Usually I read several fiction books in a row and then go back to nonfiction.  Whenever I feel my imagination is getting stale, I know it's time for more fiction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I get new ideas from books I want to act on, I jot them down on a scrap of paper and toss them into my inbox.  Then when I process my inbox, those ideas get incorporated into my personal management system, so they either end up as &#8220;someday/maybe&#8221; items to consider in the future, or they become new projects or tasks, which could include simply journaling about the idea to explore it more deeply and to generate ideas for how to apply it.  To know and not to do is not to know.  If you learn a new idea and don&#8217;t act on it, you haven&#8217;t really learned it.</p>
<p>About 1/4 of the books I read are fiction.  Some are fictional philosophy or spirituality like Ayn Rand&#8217;s <i>Atlas Shrugged</i> or James Redfield&#8217;s <i>Celestine Prophecy</i> books, but most are just pure fiction.  Last year I read Piers Anthony&#8217;s <i>Incarnations of Immortality</i> series (7 books), which I really enjoyed.  I also liked <i>The Da Vinci Code</i>.  Usually I read several fiction books in a row and then go back to nonfiction.  Whenever I feel my imagination is getting stale, I know it&#8217;s time for more fiction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mindwalker</title>
		<link>http://www.stevepavlina.com/blog/2005/02/read-a-book-a-week/#comment-837</link>
		<dc:creator>Mindwalker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2005 18:14:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stevepavlina.com/blog/2005/02/read-a-book-a-week/#comment-837</guid>
		<description>I've long-considered adopting a book-per-week "mental exercise" program as you've suggested. My problem is that I often get very excited about ideas I'm reading. Do you have any methods or suggestions for taking ideas you've read about and applying them, or at least following up on them?

Also, I was curious if you read fiction in your book-per-week program. You talked about absorbing new ideas, but I would think there's value in reading fiction as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve long-considered adopting a book-per-week &#8220;mental exercise&#8221; program as you&#8217;ve suggested. My problem is that I often get very excited about ideas I&#8217;m reading. Do you have any methods or suggestions for taking ideas you&#8217;ve read about and applying them, or at least following up on them?</p>
<p>Also, I was curious if you read fiction in your book-per-week program. You talked about absorbing new ideas, but I would think there&#8217;s value in reading fiction as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
