<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Making a Quantum Leap</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stevepavlina.com/blog/2004/12/making-a-quantum-leap/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stevepavlina.com/blog/2004/12/making-a-quantum-leap/</link>
	<description>Personal Development for Smart People</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 21:45:19 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ripples</title>
		<link>http://www.stevepavlina.com/blog/2004/12/making-a-quantum-leap/comment-page-1/#comment-1264</link>
		<dc:creator>Ripples</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2005 21:43:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stevepavlina.com/blog/2004/12/making-a-quantum-leap/#comment-1264</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Quantum weight loss&lt;/strong&gt;
I don&#039;t remember how I first came across Steve Pavlina&#039;s articles on his Dexterity Software site. But they certainly struck a sympathetic chord with me. I&#039;ve carried a few on my Palm and re-read them regularly. So I was excited</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Quantum weight loss</strong><br />
I don&#8217;t remember how I first came across Steve Pavlina&#8217;s articles on his Dexterity Software site. But they certainly struck a sympathetic chord with me. I&#8217;ve carried a few on my Palm and re-read them regularly. So I was excited</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Pavlina</title>
		<link>http://www.stevepavlina.com/blog/2004/12/making-a-quantum-leap/comment-page-1/#comment-408</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Pavlina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Dec 2004 17:02:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stevepavlina.com/blog/2004/12/making-a-quantum-leap/#comment-408</guid>
		<description>The reason weight loss seems so hard and maintenance so difficult is that overweight people don&#039;t make health and weight maintenance a top priority.  That may be a strong statement, but in my experience I&#039;ve never met a chronically overweight person who made weight loss their #1 priority.  Something else is always more important -- often it&#039;s work.  You just implied above that work is more important to you than losing weight, for example.  So it wouldn&#039;t surprise me if your work results exceed your health results for the time being.

Overweight people often claim to have no time for weight loss, yet if you look at their actual behavior, they have plenty of time -- they just put so many other things first.  They somehow manage to keep up with their favorite TV shows.  They go to work.  They spend time with family and friends.  If I was 50-60 kg overweight, goodness -- I wouldn&#039;t watch TV at all.  I wouldn&#039;t read any books except for those on the subjects of diet and exercise.  I would put my career and family and social life on the back burner and exercise at least 2-3 hours per day to get the weight off.  I would negotiate agreements with anyone that would be affected by this.  Being 50+ KG overweight is just too serious; that would mean my very life is being threatened.  That&#039;s not something that can be put on the back burner even to income.  If someone is holding a gun to your head and threatening to kill you, you don&#039;t say, &quot;Hang on, I have to finish this project first,&quot; or &quot;Sorry, I&#039;m on the way to a family celebration.&quot;

But of course, obese people don&#039;t take health this seriously.  Their standards are so low that being obese is acceptable, perhaps just mildly annoying.  That&#039;s why they&#039;re obese.  I&#039;ve seen some obese people who&#039;ve lost a lot of weight; in every case I can recall, at some point they made health their absolute priority, and they acted on it.  It became more important than work, school, family, friends, etc.  Many people think this kind of behavior is selfish ... yet another limiting belief that keeps people overweight.  It&#039;s not selfish to preserve your body such that you have much more energy to give to other people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reason weight loss seems so hard and maintenance so difficult is that overweight people don&#8217;t make health and weight maintenance a top priority.  That may be a strong statement, but in my experience I&#8217;ve never met a chronically overweight person who made weight loss their #1 priority.  Something else is always more important &#8212; often it&#8217;s work.  You just implied above that work is more important to you than losing weight, for example.  So it wouldn&#8217;t surprise me if your work results exceed your health results for the time being.</p>
<p>Overweight people often claim to have no time for weight loss, yet if you look at their actual behavior, they have plenty of time &#8212; they just put so many other things first.  They somehow manage to keep up with their favorite TV shows.  They go to work.  They spend time with family and friends.  If I was 50-60 kg overweight, goodness &#8212; I wouldn&#8217;t watch TV at all.  I wouldn&#8217;t read any books except for those on the subjects of diet and exercise.  I would put my career and family and social life on the back burner and exercise at least 2-3 hours per day to get the weight off.  I would negotiate agreements with anyone that would be affected by this.  Being 50+ KG overweight is just too serious; that would mean my very life is being threatened.  That&#8217;s not something that can be put on the back burner even to income.  If someone is holding a gun to your head and threatening to kill you, you don&#8217;t say, &#8220;Hang on, I have to finish this project first,&#8221; or &#8220;Sorry, I&#8217;m on the way to a family celebration.&#8221;</p>
<p>But of course, obese people don&#8217;t take health this seriously.  Their standards are so low that being obese is acceptable, perhaps just mildly annoying.  That&#8217;s why they&#8217;re obese.  I&#8217;ve seen some obese people who&#8217;ve lost a lot of weight; in every case I can recall, at some point they made health their absolute priority, and they acted on it.  It became more important than work, school, family, friends, etc.  Many people think this kind of behavior is selfish &#8230; yet another limiting belief that keeps people overweight.  It&#8217;s not selfish to preserve your body such that you have much more energy to give to other people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rodimus</title>
		<link>http://www.stevepavlina.com/blog/2004/12/making-a-quantum-leap/comment-page-1/#comment-407</link>
		<dc:creator>Rodimus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Dec 2004 10:27:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stevepavlina.com/blog/2004/12/making-a-quantum-leap/#comment-407</guid>
		<description>Please excluse my poor English. I&#039;m not a native speaker, and I&#039;m very tired right now so I may make mistakes.

Thank you for a truly excellent article. I shall certainly use information from it for my new year&#039;s resolution. In fact, I think it&#039;s one of the best articles you written.

I have myself experienced several quantum leaps. The secret to experiencing them is to work very hard in one direction.

However the weigth loss ideas in the article are not very appropriate.

For people who are not very overweight (for example one has 5 KGs he wants to shed) they are true. Just make the effort, shed the 5 KG, and then maintain your weight.

However, for someone who is very overweight, it&#039;s very hard to lose the required amount of weight. For example I have to lose over 50-60 KG (I think that in pounds that&#039;s about 100 pounds). 

The first 5 KG are easy. The next 5 KG is harder, and maintainance is also harder. Losing 15 KG is extremely hard, and losing 25 KG requires super-hero like will to achieve and maintain.

The problem with weight loss is that in very overweight people, maintainance after a large weight loss is extremely difficult.

The more you slim, the more maintainance effort is necessary to maintain the new weight afterwards.

If the only task I have to do is getting thin, then I would succeed. But I also have to work, etc.. and this takes away a part of my will, so less remains for maintainance, and I leap back.

Also the more diet attempts a fat person has made, the harder it is to diet and the harder it is to maintain the new low weight after a diet.

I&#039;m telling you this in order for you to see that the weight loss example is not really a good example.


Why is this text area so small? Please enlarge it. It&#039;s very hard to edit text in a text area that only holds 4 lines!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please excluse my poor English. I&#8217;m not a native speaker, and I&#8217;m very tired right now so I may make mistakes.</p>
<p>Thank you for a truly excellent article. I shall certainly use information from it for my new year&#8217;s resolution. In fact, I think it&#8217;s one of the best articles you written.</p>
<p>I have myself experienced several quantum leaps. The secret to experiencing them is to work very hard in one direction.</p>
<p>However the weigth loss ideas in the article are not very appropriate.</p>
<p>For people who are not very overweight (for example one has 5 KGs he wants to shed) they are true. Just make the effort, shed the 5 KG, and then maintain your weight.</p>
<p>However, for someone who is very overweight, it&#8217;s very hard to lose the required amount of weight. For example I have to lose over 50-60 KG (I think that in pounds that&#8217;s about 100 pounds). </p>
<p>The first 5 KG are easy. The next 5 KG is harder, and maintainance is also harder. Losing 15 KG is extremely hard, and losing 25 KG requires super-hero like will to achieve and maintain.</p>
<p>The problem with weight loss is that in very overweight people, maintainance after a large weight loss is extremely difficult.</p>
<p>The more you slim, the more maintainance effort is necessary to maintain the new weight afterwards.</p>
<p>If the only task I have to do is getting thin, then I would succeed. But I also have to work, etc.. and this takes away a part of my will, so less remains for maintainance, and I leap back.</p>
<p>Also the more diet attempts a fat person has made, the harder it is to diet and the harder it is to maintain the new low weight after a diet.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m telling you this in order for you to see that the weight loss example is not really a good example.</p>
<p>Why is this text area so small? Please enlarge it. It&#8217;s very hard to edit text in a text area that only holds 4 lines!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Pavlina</title>
		<link>http://www.stevepavlina.com/blog/2004/12/making-a-quantum-leap/comment-page-1/#comment-347</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Pavlina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2004 16:33:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stevepavlina.com/blog/2004/12/making-a-quantum-leap/#comment-347</guid>
		<description>The idea of &quot;baby radar&quot; is also called the RAC (reticular activating system).  I experience this phenomenon all the time.  What we focus on expands, which is one reason I recently pushed clarity/focus to be my top value.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The idea of &#8220;baby radar&#8221; is also called the RAC (reticular activating system).  I experience this phenomenon all the time.  What we focus on expands, which is one reason I recently pushed clarity/focus to be my top value.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave</title>
		<link>http://www.stevepavlina.com/blog/2004/12/making-a-quantum-leap/comment-page-1/#comment-344</link>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2004 14:31:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stevepavlina.com/blog/2004/12/making-a-quantum-leap/#comment-344</guid>
		<description>Interesting post Steve. You might want to further explore the processes of energy and attention. As an expectant parent you probably experienced what I call &quot;baby radar.&quot; When you&#039;re expecting, suddenly babies are everywhere. Baby stuff is all around you and it always has been, but you never really noticed it before -- I guess because we&#039;re built to filter out irrelevant inputs. I find this phenomenon holds no matter the subject.  Try it with something like buying a car. Having decided you like the looks of the New Beetle, suddenly you see them all the time.... I think this may be what MC Escher was getting at in some of his art, for example where he shows a city scene, but a bubble of detail protrudes into our view.

Unfortunately, an idea or fixation doesn&#039;t have to be &quot;good&quot; or valid in order to become the main item on our radar. When someone says &quot;she&#039;s a witch!&quot; people suddenly become alert to anything that looks or sounds like &quot;witchcraft.&quot; We saw the same thing in the mid-80&#039;s with satanic-kidnapping-rituals, recovered memories of childhood abuse, etc. 

The challenge for those interested in personal growth is, I think, to pick the things to focus on, and sustain that focus for long enough to achieve escape velocity.

I also find interesting your recent thinking about choosing the people with whom we associate. As a parent, I&#039;m absolutely convinced that you act like those that you hang out with. (And I vaguely recall certain conversations with my own parents . . .)  I agree with you that as adults we almost never conciously choose our associations, but that we would benefit from doing so. I found at one point in my life that, while I was very focused on personal growth, my friends and associates were pretty scornful of anything that smelled like &quot;self improvement.&quot; Heaven forbid that they should catch me reading &quot;7 Habits&quot; etc. 

Is that one of the things you are currently experiencing with your shift in business and personal focus?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting post Steve. You might want to further explore the processes of energy and attention. As an expectant parent you probably experienced what I call &#8220;baby radar.&#8221; When you&#8217;re expecting, suddenly babies are everywhere. Baby stuff is all around you and it always has been, but you never really noticed it before &#8212; I guess because we&#8217;re built to filter out irrelevant inputs. I find this phenomenon holds no matter the subject.  Try it with something like buying a car. Having decided you like the looks of the New Beetle, suddenly you see them all the time&#8230;. I think this may be what MC Escher was getting at in some of his art, for example where he shows a city scene, but a bubble of detail protrudes into our view.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, an idea or fixation doesn&#8217;t have to be &#8220;good&#8221; or valid in order to become the main item on our radar. When someone says &#8220;she&#8217;s a witch!&#8221; people suddenly become alert to anything that looks or sounds like &#8220;witchcraft.&#8221; We saw the same thing in the mid-80&#8217;s with satanic-kidnapping-rituals, recovered memories of childhood abuse, etc. </p>
<p>The challenge for those interested in personal growth is, I think, to pick the things to focus on, and sustain that focus for long enough to achieve escape velocity.</p>
<p>I also find interesting your recent thinking about choosing the people with whom we associate. As a parent, I&#8217;m absolutely convinced that you act like those that you hang out with. (And I vaguely recall certain conversations with my own parents . . .)  I agree with you that as adults we almost never conciously choose our associations, but that we would benefit from doing so. I found at one point in my life that, while I was very focused on personal growth, my friends and associates were pretty scornful of anything that smelled like &#8220;self improvement.&#8221; Heaven forbid that they should catch me reading &#8220;7 Habits&#8221; etc. </p>
<p>Is that one of the things you are currently experiencing with your shift in business and personal focus?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Pavlina</title>
		<link>http://www.stevepavlina.com/blog/2004/12/making-a-quantum-leap/comment-page-1/#comment-339</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Pavlina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2004 00:51:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stevepavlina.com/blog/2004/12/making-a-quantum-leap/#comment-339</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t currently follow the macrobiotic diet, although I do often eat a lot of macrobiotic foods.  I got introduced to macrobiotics through &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.realfood.com&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Real Food Daily&lt;/a&gt;, a great vegan/macrobiotic restaurant in Santa Monica, California.  In fact, I&#039;ll be eating there later this week when I return to L.A. for Xmas.  The actor Dirk Benedict wrote a book basically explaining how this diet saved his life:  &lt;i&gt;Confessions of a Kamikaze Cowboy&lt;/i&gt;.  I followed it perfectly for a while a few years ago, but I couldn&#039;t detect any measurable improvements over my base vegan diet.

I don&#039;t really have a religion that could be named.  Do I believe in a higher power?  Yes, because I&#039;ve seen evidence of some kind of force at work that appears to be beyond the physical world as I understand it.  Is it a conscious God though or is it something more like &quot;the force&quot; from Star Wars (i.e. an invisible ether of consciousness that humans can tap into, but don&#039;t quite know how very well yet)?  That I don&#039;t know.  Dr. Wayne Dyer often refers to this higher power as &quot;the source,&quot; which seems a lot like &quot;the force.&quot;

I really liked objectivism (i.e. Ayn Rand&#039;s philosophy) when I first encountered it.  &lt;i&gt;Atlas Shrugged&lt;/i&gt; is one of my all-time favorite fiction books, and &lt;i&gt;The Fountainhead&lt;/i&gt; wasn&#039;t bad either.  But I dropped this belief system quickly when I realized that if everyone was an objectivist, this planet would be utterly doomed.  Objectivism is essentially a death sentence for humanity if you think about it.  Ayn Rand makes some good points, but they were heavily influenced by her encounters with communism, and in her time the philosophy of objectivism would have seemed a lot more logical than it does today.  I think objectivism is too much of a reactive philosophy (against communism) instead of a proactive one.  Environmentally the planet is in much worse shape today than it was during Rand&#039;s time; if she were alive today, I think even she would have a hard time maintaining her original philosophy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t currently follow the macrobiotic diet, although I do often eat a lot of macrobiotic foods.  I got introduced to macrobiotics through <a href="http://www.realfood.com" target="_blank">Real Food Daily</a>, a great vegan/macrobiotic restaurant in Santa Monica, California.  In fact, I&#8217;ll be eating there later this week when I return to L.A. for Xmas.  The actor Dirk Benedict wrote a book basically explaining how this diet saved his life:  <i>Confessions of a Kamikaze Cowboy</i>.  I followed it perfectly for a while a few years ago, but I couldn&#8217;t detect any measurable improvements over my base vegan diet.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t really have a religion that could be named.  Do I believe in a higher power?  Yes, because I&#8217;ve seen evidence of some kind of force at work that appears to be beyond the physical world as I understand it.  Is it a conscious God though or is it something more like &#8220;the force&#8221; from Star Wars (i.e. an invisible ether of consciousness that humans can tap into, but don&#8217;t quite know how very well yet)?  That I don&#8217;t know.  Dr. Wayne Dyer often refers to this higher power as &#8220;the source,&#8221; which seems a lot like &#8220;the force.&#8221;</p>
<p>I really liked objectivism (i.e. Ayn Rand&#8217;s philosophy) when I first encountered it.  <i>Atlas Shrugged</i> is one of my all-time favorite fiction books, and <i>The Fountainhead</i> wasn&#8217;t bad either.  But I dropped this belief system quickly when I realized that if everyone was an objectivist, this planet would be utterly doomed.  Objectivism is essentially a death sentence for humanity if you think about it.  Ayn Rand makes some good points, but they were heavily influenced by her encounters with communism, and in her time the philosophy of objectivism would have seemed a lot more logical than it does today.  I think objectivism is too much of a reactive philosophy (against communism) instead of a proactive one.  Environmentally the planet is in much worse shape today than it was during Rand&#8217;s time; if she were alive today, I think even she would have a hard time maintaining her original philosophy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crimson</title>
		<link>http://www.stevepavlina.com/blog/2004/12/making-a-quantum-leap/comment-page-1/#comment-337</link>
		<dc:creator>Crimson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Dec 2004 00:01:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stevepavlina.com/blog/2004/12/making-a-quantum-leap/#comment-337</guid>
		<description>Can you describe the issues you had with Objectivism that caused you to reject it?  I&#039;ve only recently discovered this school of thought myself and find that many of it&#039;s tenents are things that I&#039;ve independently discovered for myself.  However, I only have a cursory understanding of Objectivism, so I don&#039;t know for sure that I&#039;d agree with all of its beliefs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you describe the issues you had with Objectivism that caused you to reject it?  I&#8217;ve only recently discovered this school of thought myself and find that many of it&#8217;s tenents are things that I&#8217;ve independently discovered for myself.  However, I only have a cursory understanding of Objectivism, so I don&#8217;t know for sure that I&#8217;d agree with all of its beliefs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neon</title>
		<link>http://www.stevepavlina.com/blog/2004/12/making-a-quantum-leap/comment-page-1/#comment-336</link>
		<dc:creator>neon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Dec 2004 23:31:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stevepavlina.com/blog/2004/12/making-a-quantum-leap/#comment-336</guid>
		<description>Great articles Steve, I am very thankful for them. I am just curious, are you eating macrobiotic? And what&#039;s your last religion leap? :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great articles Steve, I am very thankful for them. I am just curious, are you eating macrobiotic? And what&#8217;s your last religion leap? <img src='http://www.stevepavlina.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reinout van Rees</title>
		<link>http://www.stevepavlina.com/blog/2004/12/making-a-quantum-leap/comment-page-1/#comment-332</link>
		<dc:creator>Reinout van Rees</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Dec 2004 16:18:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stevepavlina.com/blog/2004/12/making-a-quantum-leap/#comment-332</guid>
		<description>Seeing &quot;Bajoran wormhole aliens&quot; mentioned as a label-able religion... :-)

Reinout</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seeing &#8220;Bajoran wormhole aliens&#8221; mentioned as a label-able religion&#8230; <img src='http://www.stevepavlina.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Reinout</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
